Recent content by Superwoops

  1. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Your honour, the narrative of this case has been that EpicFought was an in-training employee who was learning the ropes of being a federal prosecutor. Witness testimony, along with the presented evidence, only reinforces this narrative. It was not clear before if use of AI was mentioned in the...
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Your honour, I’d like to request a 24hr extension as I have current IRL commitments that I can’t postpone
  3. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Agreed, apologies, no further questions your honour
  4. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honor, may I withdraw question 3?
  5. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honour, I apologize for the 90-minute delay. I was under the impression that I had 24 more hours to ask the questions. When I realised I didn’t, I quickly posted them.
  6. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Questions for RaiTheGuy07: @MasterAshim 1. Why did you kill the three individuals? (Doc, IamJeb_ and Argen_Lee) 2. Was it your belief at the time that you had received consent to kill from those three individuals? 3. Were you ever reprimanded for poor job performance? 4. What has been your...
  7. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    Question withdrawn. For Freeze_Line: Was my client’s time of employment at the DOJ enough to train him and assess his competence?
  8. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honour, I am requesting a 48hr extension as I am out of town with very little cell service for Easter
  9. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    EpicFought (Devaculous) 1. In the Employee Handbook from the time you were employed at the Department of Justice, was there any mention of AI not being permitted in your work? 2. Did you write the majority of your arguments yourself? 3. After your employer informed you that you should not use...
  10. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - SPECULATION This part of the answer is speculative and is not factual testimony, only an assumption. P-003 and P-004 convey that the great majority of my client's work was his own. The fact that he used AI to aid him in this...
  11. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE The question assumes that EpicFought displayed conduct unbecoming of a prosecutor. Opposing counsel has failed to provide evidence detailing that my client's conduct was unbecoming of a prosecutor...
  12. S

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Apologies your honour, I hope the Court can forgive my being late: 1. NotADoctor7819 and NotADoctor9217 (aka Doc) (NotADoctor7819) 2. Doesn't appear to have Discord or forums 3. Argen_Lee (Argen) 4. RaiTheGuy07 (MasterAshim) (MasterAshim)
  13. S

    Lawsuit: In Session EpicFought v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 19

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your honour, today I will argue that my client’s termination was unjust and arbitrary. To do this, we will go through the interrogatory answers, and then a thorough analysis of every reasoning for the grounds of termination...
Back
Top