Recent content by Staff Team

https://wiki.democracycraft.net/Staff_Vetos

Please refer to the staff-courts guide @ko531 and do not summon staff for questions which should be ascertained through the warrant process. Exercising staff privilege to recuse ourselves from further questions.

Respectfully, the questions were raised to the whole staff team. I'd appreciate if you didn't lecture me on how I need to facilitate your request or that our lack of records on this very vague request is unsatisfactory for you. The reality is we have had staff members leave. We have 22,000...

I just want to expectation manage you here that Staff are able to be called to clarify specific staff events and plugin related questions. I would consider the amount of questions being posed to the staff team here excessive, but, I will answer them. Any further questions need to be more to the...

Present. Please ping @End on all responses required.

Now in the care of DCGovernment

Apologies for the interjection your honor, the Staff team would like to notify the court and the relevant parties that naezaratheus has been permanently deported and banned from the DemocracyCraft Discord. ~ DemocracyCraft Staff

Senator End has requested I explicitly lick the court (do not fact check this). As such, may it arouse the court, and by extension, Your Honour, that the court has been licked. To the questions: No. No.

Present

A minimum of 1 (one) clue and a maximum of 3 (three) clues.

" It appears so, yes."

1. Yes 2. Not in its standard form. However, we are aware that, on occasion, glitches allow for block placement where clues appear. 3. If a staff member is on a ticket during a discussion, they are acting in their official capacity as a staff member. 4. Not sure, we don’t have a reference or...

Your Honor, We are present... :)

Unfortunately a Staff Veto already exists on this matter, and therefore this Act is also already Staff Vetoed. You can find existing Staff Vetoes here, which is where we try and record all vetoes we make for transparency, but also to capture and provide a statement of reasons. This veto...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION REALTV4968 Plaintiff v. Staff Team Defendant ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM To the honorable Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont: The Defendant, Staff Team, responds to the Plaintiff’s “complaint” as follows: I...