Recent content by SplashyAlpaca77

  1. S

    Lawsuit: Pending MattisSuperstar v. teji2 [2026] DCR 189

    Present, Your Honor.
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    1. Only indicated 2. It was at least 45k, but could have been more if I needed it 3. An estimate based on my knowledge of poy 4. I was not looking at other banks until the statements 5. Yes 6. Pellanth 7. No, I took them at their word because I had had experiences with being ripped off in the...
  3. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PLAINTIFF Your Honour, Discovery is closed. No witnesses were called by either side. The record is documentary: the Plaintiff's exhibits P-001 to P-012, the Defence's pleadings, and the Defence's own admissions. On...
  4. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honor, On conversion. As Fact 16 and 17, supported by P-012 prove, the defendant was the sole owner and accessor of Isrealidefenseforces, which did not have to be an in-game company in order to access the funds illegally The...
  5. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND Your Honor, The Plaintiff respectfully requests amendments to their Complaint, in light of the fact that I did not originally file this complaint and feel the need for additional clarification and evidence. The proposed...
  6. S

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    5. Complex interest, I was and am unaware of the precise interest rate, and I am unaware of the interest interval
  7. S

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    7. In a VC with playerdata, I was told the bank could def make it work 8. I knew it was at least 45k, but it could have been more if I had decided so.
  8. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Pellanth Credit & Banking (Represented by lao19) Plaintiff v. Schmuck (Minecraft Username: schmuck) Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I...
  9. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86

    Motion To Amend Pursuant to Your Honor's response to objections and Court Rule 3.3, I would like permission to modify the complaint to add facts and evidence supporting them. FACTS: 13. IsrealiDefenseForces was owned by an account with the Minecraft username schmuck(P-008). 14. The "unverified"...
  10. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86

    Apologies, Your Honor. I had accidently pressed control enter whilst trying to press shift enter. May I still respond to the objection?
  11. S

    Lawsuit: Dismissed SplashyAlpaca77 vs. DCFish & Universoul_ [2026] DCR 181

    Motion to Dismiss for Res Judicia Your Honor, The two parties have decided on and settled this matter. Please Dismiss this case.
  12. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck [2026] FCR 86

    Answer to Objections Threshold matter The Response to the Order to Show Cause is a written submission of argument, filed because the Court demanded it under Rule 1.9. It is not witness testimony and it is not a question put to a witness. The Objections Guide defines "Assumes facts not in...
Back
Top