Recent content by S_Starlight

Your honor, this was Hatman mention that steelbirch6844 used to be Valuedatom4578.

Your honor, SteelBirch6844. is the alt of ValuedAtom4578 due to some complication with his account. Staff team can verify.

I, S_Starlight, declare that I will be contesting the Office of President. My Vice Presidential running mate will be Cr_2007. I will be running as an independent

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT QUESTION FOR THE WITNESS AMAH853 1. What did you tell .SteelBirch6844 immediately before they sent the disputed message? 2.What wording did you provide to .SteelBirch6844 for accepting the Agreement? 3.How did .SteelBirch6844's message...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - foundation/speculation The defence object to the answer of Q11 as foundation The witness says that six of the eight commands were already written, but does not explain the reason the witness thought that six commands were...

The defence has amended to the requirement of the court your honor.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - LEADING/COMPOUND QUESTION The defence wishes to object to the following question for leading 15. At any point, did you expressly agree to waive, cancel, or extinguish the DC$1,000 Initial Fee? (amah853) Reason: The question is...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The defence wishes for your honor to reconsider While the Defense recognizes that intent can be a factual issue when dealing with contract law issues, the problem lies in who the intent pertains to. Riniki_ has not been...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - CALLS FOR CONCLUSION The defence object to this question as a rather opinion question and not factual question 11. Did you intend that statement to cancel or waive .SteelBirch6844's DC$1,000 payment obligation?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUME NOT IN EVIDENCE The defence object to this question as it is not in evidence It was only after the Plaintiff later requested payment that you relied on the quotation marks to argue that you had not accepted the Agreement...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - LEADING QUESTION The defence object to this question as a leading question Did .SteelBirch6844 state at that time that the message was merely an example, quotation, draft, or rejection of the Agreement? This Involves questions...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Call FOR CONCLUSION The defence wishes to object to the following question on Call got conclusion 8. Based on the message and the conversation immediately surrounding it, how did you understand SteelBirch6844’s response at the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT I, SGT S_Starlight, representing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), reports back that a total of $15920.71 was seized from the defendant and is currently in govsecurity. From what @CreeperTD , then LT of DHS who was in charge of...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The court be please'd. The defendant's stance is simple: the plaintiff has not proved that the defendant clearly accepted the Agreement. A contract under the Contract Act...

Your honor, disregard. Opening statement will be given in 72h