Recent content by Redmont Bar Association

OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, Members of the Court, The defendant has contended that the RBA Chair lacks the authority to "veto" or obstruct the Ethics Chair's appointment of committee members. Allow me to direct your attention to the Super Modern Legal Board Act, which meticulously...

Follow-up: 1. Could you kindly provide a comprehensive list of all the cases where you have served as legal counsel? 2. Have you ever won a case? 3. When did you join DC? 4. At what point did you acquire your license to practice law?

MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, although the law in question was enacted after the initiation of this case, it should not be the sole factor considered in determining Mr. Love's eligibility to serve as legal counsel for the plaintiff. Attached are comments made by Mr. Love in the channel...

Your Honor, we were merely reacting to the motion to strike. Last time I checked, we're not obligated to be instructed to respond before doing so. Hence, in line with this assertion, we're simply addressing the motion.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honor, Please accept our apologies for the delay; we were lost in reviewing the amicus brief.

Questions for royalsnakee: 1. Is it accurate that you've received a contempt of court charge in each case where you've served as legal counsel? We will have follow up questions

OBJECTION Breach of Procedure Your Honor. Mr. Love is speaking out of turn. The RBA is in the process of preparing our opening statements. As you mentioned earlier, the plaintiff should have been present throughout this trial. The plaintiff themselves are a licensed attorney and should have...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honor, The plaintiff has failed to submit their opening statement within the 72-hour timeframe allotted to them. We respectfully request that you hold them in contempt and allow us to move on with this case. Thank You.

OBJECTION Assumes facts not in evidence. Your Honor, as you noted, it remains uncertain whether there is concrete evidence establishing whether the defendant was indeed banned from forums. Therefore, the assertion made by the defendant presupposes the truthfulness of an individual's claim...

OBJECTION Breach of Procedure Your Honor, the Redmont Bar Association does not have the authority to impose bans, as this falls under the purview of the staff. Temporary deportation does not equate to a forum ban, as evidenced by Royalsnakee's current activity on this forum. This procedural...

OBJECTION Perjury Your Honor, the witness has just committed perjury by lying under oath. It has been clearly stated by staff that individuals are only banned from forums if they are permanently banned from the game. As evidenced below, Royalsnakee was not permanently banned. An official staff...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLAINTIFF OPENING STATEMENT Ladies and Gentlemen of the Court, Today, we gather in this esteemed chamber not merely to judge the actions of an individual, but to uphold the very pillars upon which the law stands. The Redmont Bar...

Your Honor, the Redmont Bar Association respectfully requests to submit the following evidence:

Your Honor, the Redmont Bar Association respectfully requests to submit the following evidence:

Your Honor , the changes were made.