Recent content by Patototongo1

AMBIGUOUS Your Honor, The question's phrasing asks the witness to “provide context” for a prior statement, which fails to clearly define what specific information is being sought. The term “context” is inherently broad and undefined in this instance. It could refer to the factual circumstances...

CALLS FOR A CONCLUSION Your Honor, The question, “In D-005, D-003, and D-002, you make several mentions that your sentence was the result of a glitch. What made you think this?” improperly seeks the witness’ reasoning, belief, or interpretation regarding their sentence, rather than asking for...

FOUNDATION, PRIVILEGE Your Honor, This question improperly assumes that the witness is in a position to know or verify what prior counsel may have shared with current counsel, a matter that has not been established as within the personal knowledge of the witness and almost definitely isn't...

The plaintiff retracts the request.

Your honor, It seems previous council did add another witness to the witness list during discovery (Lawsuit: In Session - DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42) who was not issued a writ of summons at the beginning of questioning, the Plaintiff would like to bring this issue to the...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, the Plaintiff respectfully submits that this objection is entirely without merit. At no point has counsel been hostile toward the Staff Team or engaged in improper argument with their testimony. The statement in question simply highlighted the insufficiency...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, the Plaintiff respectfully submits that the edits in question were made immediately after the original response was filed, solely for the purpose of clarity and completeness. This was not an attempt to conceal, mislead, or alter the course of proceedings. The...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, The Plaintiff notes that this objection overlooks a key fact: we have already addressed this matter in the Motion to Amend that is being discussed. In said motion, we clearly explained that current counsel (at the time) had only recently assumed responsibility...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, The Plaintiff’s counsel respectfully submits that this objection is clearly without merit. The questions at issue are plainly not identical to those previously asked. Earlier inquiries focused on general knowledge or awareness regarding jail procedures and the...

Your honor, No further questions to the Plaintiff @DocsTheory thank you. @End Respectfully, the questions are directed to the Staff Team collectively, as set out in the witness list and the writ of summons, not to End individually. Accordingly, the Plaintiff respectfully urges the Staff Team...

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honor, the plaintiff’s daily updates were submitted to and handled by previous counsel. As such, current counsel does not have access to these records, nor is it within our discretion to provide them. Moreover, we strongly urge the Court to deny this motion...

Your honor, The plaintiff respectfully requests permission to respond to the defence’s motion to compel.

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, the plaintiff was not offering a legal opinion but simply responding based on his personal perception of the evidence presented so far. His view of whether the Defense’s evidence aligns with his lived experience is relevant to his testimony. We respectfully...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, This objection lacks simple merit. The plaintiff was directly answering a question about how his incarceration impacted his earnings and opportunities based on his role in-game. His statement reflects his lived experience, including the clear, direct...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, The defense’s claim of perjury is entirely unfounded. The matter at hand concerns a disputed fact regarding the duration of time served by the plaintiff, a fact which this Court has not yet ruled on. Until the Court determines the truth of that fact, it is...