Recent content by Novakerbal

:nay:- Incomplete, also this criminalizes planting Upperoni but not owning it?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IgnitedTnT Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. Affirm 2. Affirm 3. Affirm 4. Affirm 5. Affirm 6. Affirm 7. Affirm 8. Affirm 9. Affirm 10. Affirm II. DEFENCES 1. Good Faith Execution...

@ElysiaCrynn In your capacity as the DOC Secretary, does the DOC possess any official records indicating that RDS was officially registered as an LLC or a Corporation under Redmont Law and the DOC regulatory framework? What prerequisites are required before a reliable market rate for foreign...

Your Honor, As stated above, the Plaintiff believes that discovery has yet to pass in this case. Notably the cited rule (3.6) states that "affirmations or denials on all facts in addition to having defenses under the law or fact prior to the end of discovery". If what the Plaintiff says is...

Your Honor, The Commonwealth is seeking clarification as to whether discovery has indeed been tolled. As noted in the Motion for Default Judgement, it is not typically permitted for an answer to complaint to be submitted after discovery has concluded. Therefore, the Commonwealth would like to...

Your Honor, I will be representing the Commonwealth in this case going forward. In order to familiarize myself with the case, I request a 48 hour extension for the deadline of the response to the motion for Default Judgement.

Your Honor, As a current member of the LGBTQ+ community (“Queer”), I humbly request to submit an amicus brief on the validity of the released information being a “political opinion”.

:nay: - Incredibly petty for no reason

:aye:- I’m salivating

Your Honor, The Commonwealth has all the material and is prepared to submit it. However, some of the material was formerly classified, and other parts contain commercial in confidence information. We ask that a Closed Court session be created to submit the requested material. Failing a closed...

The Commonwealth does wish for a ruling on the constitutionality of this act, and whether it can be enforced. We would seek to remove this action to the Federal Court if necessary.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honor, The Commonwealth believes that the constitutional right to "Freedom of Political Communication" does not protect the Defendant from prosecution in this case. In support of this, the Commonwealth would like to examine past...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure Under Rule 5.1 of the Court Rules and Procedures a Motion to Dismiss must specify the Discovery Rule that a lawyer wishes to submit under. As this motion does not list a Rule for dismissal, it is not a valid motion.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure, Improper Evidence Your Honor, There exists no "Motion To Submit New Evidence" present within the Court Rules and Procedures, or the page detailing all motions. We ask that the Honorable Judge ignore this...

Your Honor, While the Commonwealth at large was tangentially aware of the deal reached regarding the sale of RDS shares as part of a Foreign Exchange Scheme at the time listed. However, the Commonwealth did not become aware of any criminal misrepresentation of valuation and ownership until...