Recent content by MaxvEtten

  1. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed kisskissy v. stellar_night [2026] DCR 84

    IN THE DISTRICT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Your Honor The Plaintiff respectfully moves for Default Judgement against the Defendant. On the 11th of June the Defendant was summoned to court, the Defendant pointed out that he would not be available for a few...
  2. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honor, First of all the Defense would like to apologise, since this Motion was not filed at the proper time, I personally did not take the time I had before to file this motion, that is why it is a little late, the...
  3. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Oakridge Credit Line v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 117

    Your Honor, My client informed me I made a slight mistake in the filing of this case. I was under the impression that the $3,600 I mentioned were interest for the $5,000. However my client informed me that I was mistaken as the $3,600 was outstanding debt the Defendant already accumulated with...
  4. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Oakridge Credit Line v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 117

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Oakridge Credit Line Plaintiff v. Zombie_Bro_ Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF On the 23th of April, the Plaintiff, Oakridge Credit Line...
  5. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY FINDING Your Honor, The Plaintiff defined that Loss of Enjoyment is measured by whether the Plaintiff can engage in activities in the same way as before the harm. The Defendant's conduct did not interfere with the Plaintiff's...
  6. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION RELEVANCE Your Honor, The Defendant objects to P-010 and P-011, which shows screenshots of other employment not related to fisher duties, being completed / sought. However this is not relevant to this case, since the Plaintiff was...
  7. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Defendant moves that P-009 be struck from the court record, the screenshot shows a Discord ticket, which the Plaintiff does not authenticate at all. The messages indicate that the Plaintiff could...
  8. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION RELEVANCE Your Honor, The Defendant objects to P-008, which shows screenshots of Discord messages saying Aventura was unsafe and violent during the time of the incident. This does not mean that everyone in Aventura contributes to...
  9. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Defendant moves that the exhibit P-005 be struck from the court record, since it is a duplicate of P-006, and does not add any additional value to this case, P-005 shows no information P-006 does not...
  10. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE Your Honor, The Defendant moves that the exhibits P-001 and P-002 be struck from the court record, on the basis that they both are a duplicate of P-003, and do not add any additional value to this case, they show no...
  11. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MaxvEtten v. .orangemoney8141 [2026]

    Your Honor, The Plaintiff respectfully submits that civil damages are not limited to their penalty unit cap. Under Redmont law, crimes may be used to seek civil damages, and civil proceedings may proceed independently of any criminal prosecution, allowing courts to award damages reflecting the...
  12. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISCOVERY FINDING Your Honor, The Defendant suggests changing the name of the screenshot submitted by the Plaintiff earlier today, showing the playtime of the Plaintiff, from P-005 to P-007, since P-005 is already in use for another piece of...
  13. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MaxvEtten v. TheBestFox [2026] DCR 90

    Your Honor, The Plaintiff submits that the conversation in P-001 between parties constitutes a valid and binding agreement for $250 administration costs. On top of that the Plaintiff would like to submit P-004 as evidence, in which The Defendant explicitly confirms the mutual understanding...
  14. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MaxvEtten v. .orangemoney8141 [2026]

    Your Honor, Under the Redmont Civil Code Act, nominal damages may be sought without any significant losses. The Defendant intentionally attempted to murder the Plaintiff, as a result of which the Plaintiff suffered physical harm, serious emotional distress, loss of enjoyment, and had great fear...
  15. MaxvEtten

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MMiqa v. rykazard [2026] DCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT MMiqa Plaintiff v. rykazard Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defendant AFFIRMS that on June 2, 2026, the Plaintiff, MMiqa, was present in Aventura, a designated city area of the Commonwealth of Redmont. 2. The...
Back
Top