Recent content by Mask3D_WOLF

  1. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    For Angryhamdog: 1. Under what circumstances are detention justified according to law or DHS policy? 2. Where is detention codified in law as a recourse for the DHS to use in situations like the situation of this lawsuit?
  2. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    4. In the case of detention, yes.
  3. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    1. I have been working in the DHS since March of 2022. 2. I have. I detained the offending person to get them treatment and charged them as usual. 3. Detain the person spreading the disease, get them treatment, and charge them as usual. I request that #4 be rephrased before I respond, due to...
  4. Mask3D_WOLF

    Ping Sofia.

    @Sofia2750
  5. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Multiman155 v. Cahania [2025] DCR 34

    I will be unable to provide an amicus brief. I apologize.
  6. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Multiman155 v. Cahania [2025] DCR 34

    I request a 48 hour extension, please.
  7. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Lawanoesepr Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AFFIRM that on June 30th, Redmont Citizen lawanoespr (“Plaintiff”) was at spawn while affected by a disease and actively spreading it...
  8. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Multiman155 v. Cahania [2025] DCR 34

    May I file an amicus brief on the legality of trials by combat, their settings, and motions for such?
  9. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: In Session lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    The Commonwealth respectfully requests a 24 hour extension to provide an answer to complaint.
  10. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    OBJECTION - PERJURY Many of the employees listed, myself included, did not work with Plaintiff directly. They therefore cannot provide relevant testimony about his work performance or character, having never interacted with him.
  11. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    OBJECTION - Relevance Plaintiff has resorted to calling every single member of the department, whether ever even having an interaction with him or not, as witnesses. Defense requests that it be ordered that plaintiff's witness list be consolidated, or that the specific relevance of every...
  12. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2025] FCR 64

    May I file an amicus brief, as a Captain of the police force?
Back
Top