Recent content by Mask3D_WOLF

It looks like there was a bit of confusion as to whether I am a lawyer. I confirm I am. I therefore refile my request for Amicus Brief in my full qualifications as an attorney.

I would like to speak to the ethical implications of situations such as these in Redmont, in order to better equip the court in its understanding of interpreting where damages should lie for such an act.

1. Event Coordinators should apply rules practically and with common sense. 2. I observed the presence of complaints of not revealing rules and later enforcing them, along with hostile communications.

I, His Holiness Pope Benedict XVII, Bishop of Redmont, Vicar of Tuk, Successor of the Prince of the Tukostles, Supreme Pontiff of the Tukostolic Church, Patriarch of Hamilton, Primate of Redmont, Metropolitan Archbishop of the Reveillian Province, Sovereign of the Vatican City State, Servant of...

Your Honor, I have resigned as co-counsel as of today. Plaintiff, feel free to ask me questions.

OBJECTION LEADING QUESTION Questioner questions witness with information they seek to confirm.

OBJECTION LEADING QUESTION Question includes information that questioner seeks to confirm and in a way that suggests a positive response (“Would you agree that…”). This is a textbook leading question, and therefore should be struck before witness answers any questions.

Your Honor, I will temporarily be serving as BabySoga’s co-counsel.

Your Honor, when should I answer the questions?

I ask that the leading questions asked to me be rephrased before I answer, Your Honor.

3. I believe that BabySoga should have communicated with the players better, especially in regards to the rules.

Respectfully, may I have a 48 hour extension? I have been swamped recently, and have multiple funerals to attend.

Could I please get clarification on question 3? I am unsure of what mistakes we are referring to. Also, could it be confirmed that I will be answering question 1? +Benedict

Follow your dreams 💜