Recent content by lao19

  1. L

    Lawsuit: Pending Pellanth Credit & Banking v. Schmuck

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Pellanth Credit & Banking (Represented by lao19) Plaintiff v. Schmuck (Minecraft Username: schmuck) Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I...
  2. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 420mss v. Sockful [2026] DCR 103

    Action will be continued with @TheREALWINner as co-counsel. Please regard them and their messages as such.
  3. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 420mss v. Sockful [2026] DCR 103

    @Muggy21 Your Honour, Discovery ended approximately 1 week ago, I would like to request opening statements to begin promptly.
  4. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed NovaKerbal v. landshaking [2026] FCR 61

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE The Defense motions to strike evidence P-002 due to chat logs being inadmissible in court under Court Rules and Procedures Rule 4.6 DATED: This 3rd day of August 2026
  5. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed NovaKerbal v. landshaking [2026] FCR 61

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT NovaKerbal Plaintiff v. landshaking Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defense DENIES that On July 9th, NovaKerbal messaged landshaking inquiring as to whether they had voted, as no evidence has been provided to...
  6. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 420mss v. Sockful [2026] DCR 103

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WITNESS LIST Your Honour, The Plaintiff submits the following witness list: 1. 420mss 2. Sockful 3. cr1msnx Respectfully submitted, lao19
  7. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed NovaKerbal v. landshaking [2026] FCR 61

    Court-appointed counsel present, Your Honor.
  8. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 420mss v. Sockful [2026] DCR 103

    Amendment has been made and changes bolded and colored, Your Honor.
  9. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed .Farmerkalechip v. GnomeCorp [2026] DCR 110

    Your Honor, The Plaintiff states that the documents that have been requested by the Defendant do not exist. Although these particular documents do not exist, the Plaintiff still alleges that the Defendant is guilty of libel and intends to continue proceedings.
  10. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 420mss v. Sockful [2026] DCR 103

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE I. CLAIRIFICATION OF COURT ORDER My understanding of the Court Order to Show Cause is as follows: 1. In the case, MMiqa v. ZachOfPotatoes10 [2026] DCR 67, a Motion to Dismiss is granted by the judge under...
  11. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 420mss v. Sockful [2026] DCR 103

    CIVIL ACTION 420mss Plaintiff v. Sockful Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. 420mss, Plaintiff 2. Sockful, Defendant II. FACTS 1. On 12 June 2026 at approximately 2:40 Redmont time, the...
  12. L

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MZombie0429 v. ClayGuy [2026] DCR 99

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MZombie0429 Plaintiff v. ClayGuy Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. MZombie0429 2. Clayguy II. FACTS 1. The Plaintiff is by...
Back
Top