Recent content by Kiwi_Boi_Gamer

Your Honour @Franciscus, The Parties have agreed to a Settlement Agreement outside of Court and wish for the case to be Dismissed with Prejudice. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE The defence moves that the complaint in this case be...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - NON-RESPONSIVE & SPECULATION The Defendant objects to Flechingrs' Response to Question 1 as it is non-responsive, speculative, and purjury. 1.1. NON-RESPONSIVE Question 1 is a definitive question requiring a definitive answer of...

Your Honour @Franciscus, Would you please set a deadline for @Fletchingrs to respond? As per Rule 6.6 (Response Times)

Yes, your Honour @Franciscus, I have one further question for @Fletchingrs: 1. Were you aware that the Defendant had not been granted permissions when you asked, "do you need permission to destroy property" (A-003)? (yes/no)

Your Honour @Franciscus, I am still awaiting a ruling on my objection.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PURJURY The Defendant alleges that Flechingrs has committed purjury in their Response to Question 3 by knowingly providing false testimony to the Court. Actual Knowledge of the Truth In Response to question 2; Flechingrs...

CROSS-EXAMINATION QUESTIONS All dates are formatted dd/mm/yyyy. Times are formatted 12:00 in Central European Time (GMT+1) Questions for @Fletchingrs 1. Do you think that granting permissions would make the Defendant’s permissions “active”? (yes/no) 2. Were you the only user (excluding Staff)...

Your honour @Franciscus, It has been 24 hours since your post and the Defendant is ready to send cross-examination questions

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Flechingrs has committed perjury in his response to questions 2 and 3. Response 2: Flechingrs claims that he first became aware of the permission not being active on 2/28 at 9:30 AM. When in reality Flechingrs expressly...

Your Honour @Franciscus, @Fletchingrs has failed to provide answers to the Court within 24 hours.

Your Honour @Franciscus, The Defendant wishes to amend their witness list by removing "sarf123" as a witness. Reasons for removing "sarf123" as a witness: 1. The Defendant has no questions for "sarf123". 2. It will save time by removing "sarf123" as a witness. Noting the Constitutional right...

Your Honour @Franciscus, I have the following objections... IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTIONS - LEADING QUESTION & ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE Question 2 for Fletchingrs: "On February 26th, what specific in-game commands did you execute to attempt to grant...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DEFENDANTS OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour @Franciscus, The Parties entered into a valid, binding contract for the renovation of Plot S079. While the Defendant did not complete any work on Plot S079. The Defendant did not breach the contract...

Your Honour @Franciscus, The Defendant must insist that the Plaintiff produce the "rent logs" if they exist. Noting "2.1. Rent logs will be useful for determining if there is any damage or loss to the Plaintiff." Noting that the Court has already produced the "permission logs" and the...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour @Franciscus, The Plaintiff has committed perjury in their case filing by asserting it was a fact that the Defendant held "active "Member" permissions" between on or about 25th Feb. The Plaintiff's asserted...