It pains me to do this, especially with this case, a case which hasn't received a verdict for such an astronomical amount of time. Unfortunately, I will no longer be able to continue as a judge - or the presiding officer of this case - due to IRL circumstances. I deeply apologize for...
I would like to apologize to both parties and to the citizens who have been likely awaiting the outcome of this case. Unfortunately, given IRL obligations, I have delayed this case more than it should have been.
I'm stepping down as a judge and so officially recuse from the case as the...
Granted.
This is perfectly understandable. Though procedure generally helps things move along in an understandable and orderly manner, it can - in certain situations - become a hindrance. It is difficult as it is to sort through everything with the limited time I have. Having to sort through...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENAS
@dearev, @MysticPhunky, @lawanoesepr, @Dogeington, and @End are ORDERED TO PROVIDE the documents described by the attached quote. Apologies for the brevity.
Reminder for @dearev...
Apologies for the extreme tardiness on my end. I moved for college, and it's been complicated.
I'm going to assume it's needed so Discovery is being extended by 4 days from the time of this post. The Court will be addressing motions and any pertinent objections shortly.
Denied. The request is for any information the Commonwealth already possesses not information from the individual. There is no expectation to compel the individual to tell you anything nor is there an expectation to defend the individual. If you do not know the answer, that's fine but needs to...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
SUBPOENA
The Court grants a modified version of Plaintiff's first Motion to Compel.
The Commonwealth is ordered to produce the following documents:
1. Any entries from dearev in the...
Sustained with a caveat. To the best of your ability, the Commonwealth is directed to answer the question. If the information has to be obtained from the officer directly, they should be made aware of their fifth right.
Sustained. The Commonwealth is directed to answer the question.
Overruled...
Some clarifications before the Court rules on pending matters.
1. Discovery will be extended for an additional 5 days from the time of this post. The same rules apply regarding extensions and ending early.
2. The legal issue of vicarious liability and respondeat superior are not resolved as...
Overruled. A part of Plaintiff's responsibility in proving the Commonwealth's liability in the corruption claim is to demonstrate that the government officer's acts were corrupt. Regardless, the Court will provide an early warning to Plaintiff to not venture from their claims against the...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
I. SETTLEMENT
It is not correct to say that, since a settlement offer has been made, Plaintiff no longer has standing. Though the offer does aim to provide...
Noting Plaintiff's remarks, the Court grants the motion to compel.
Sustained. The procedural issue goes a bit back. Requests to compel should be made in motions. If the original request was made in a motion to compel, Plaintiff would have provided a response, then the Court would have asked...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.