I let him know on the 25th that he should start looking for new counsel since I was becoming worried I wouldn't be able to provide an adequate defense due to time constraints. However, I did say I would continue handling the case in the same message.
Yesterday, because I was positive I wouldn't...
Your Honor,
I will be withdrawing from this case as Defendant's counsel. I apologize to all parties since this lies entirely on me. A real problem I have is a weak ability to accurately gauge what amount of work I can handle, which leads to me taking on more than I ultimately can. This case is...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
IgnitedTnT v. RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC [2026] FCR 12
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
Your Honor,
The Answer states, "The Defense AFFIRMS all the listed facts aside for Fact No.9." Plaintiff's amendment didn't add any new facts...
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION
A legal question at the center of this case is the interpretation of the phrasing "profits and losses shall be distributed." (This specific phrasing can be found in Section 6 of D-006.) D-006 is relevant because it aids us in understanding how this phrasing is used in the...
SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE
Pursuant to Court Rule 4.6, the Defense submits the following into evidence:
[/spoiler]
To avoid any objections, the Defense preemptively states that this evidence will be used to support our interpretation of "profits and losses." D-005 will be used to suggest that...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
IgnitedTnT v. RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC [2026] FCR 12
MOTION TO DISMISS
Your Honor,
The Defense moves to dismiss this action pursuant to Rules 5.5 & 5.7 of the Court Rules and Procedures.
Following the arguments made in the Answer, we...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
IgnitedTNT
Plaintiff
v.
RiggoSoft
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
The Defense AFFIRMS all the listed facts aside for Fact No.9.
The Defense DENIES that RiggoSoft is the sole member of LeafLuxury LLC (Fact No. 9)...
Your Honor,
May I request a 24 hour extension from the original deadline to submit? I'm awaiting critical information from my client, and he hasn't had an opportunity to provide it yet.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
IgnitedTnT v. RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC [2026] FCR 12
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
Your Honor,
The Defense does not agree to the proposed Motion for Summary Judgement.
1. IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131 claimed...
Your Honor,
I'll be representing RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC in this case.
May I ask how long I have to provide an Answer and a response to the Motion for Summary Judgement?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.