Recent content by JunkCereal

Extension granted.

Notification and update on this. The judgement will be ready to be posted 24 hours after the time the quoted post was made. If a brief is not filed before then, it will not be considered in the judgement.

@ToadKing, please provide a brief explaining the purpose of requesting punitive damages on behalf of the other 33 users. As a class action group, do you plan to distribute winnings amongst the other users not listed as plaintiffs in this case? In the brief, you may include any other information...

It is correct that Plaintiff filed the appeal on behalf of their client, BrustkleFurry, but the purpose of the appeal was to seek legal fees. _lucaaa_ v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 43 - Appeal. Since these fees would have been payable to Plaintiff, it is reasonable to say that the delay affected...

Granted.

You have 48 hours from the time of this post to file an Answer to Complaint.

You may do so.

The Attorney General, @gribble19, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Lex Titanum v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72.

Could you please provide: 1. Proof Lex Titanum has legal standing, viz. proof of registration as a business; and 2. Proof of either a.) ownership or b.) an agreement of representation.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Lex Titanum v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 70 ORDER OF DISMISSAL At the request of the plaintiff, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff is instructed to provide proof of qualification when they refile the case.

You may provide the evidence.

The Attorney General, @gribble19, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Lex Titanum v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 70.

To avoid being an advocate for the plaintiffs, this will be the last clarifying question asked. Does Counsel have any evidence demonstrating that Discover Bank was registered as a financial institution with the Department of Commerce?

First, to clarify what is happening procedurally. Defendant is no longer contesting this case. The Court still needs to ensure that Plaintiff meets their burden of proof, so from here on, this case will be a hearing between the Court and Plaintiff. ISSUES REQUIRING CLARIFICATION 1. Plaintiff...

After review, the Court has noticed issues that would harm this case in a default judgement. In order to provide the plaintiffs the opportunity to address these issues, this case is no longer in recess and the prior response to the Motion for Default Judgement is rescinded.