Recent content by jsrkiwi

  1. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO WITNESS QUESTIONS Your Honour, I’ve included the Defendant’s objections in quotation boxes throughout for clarity. Many of the objections are repetitive, so the Plaintiff addresses them in groups where relevant, for efficiency. To save the...
  2. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLAINTIFF’S CONSOLIDATED LIST OF WITNESS QUESTIONS Your Honour, the Plaintiff’s consolidated list of witness questions is laid out below. Witness 1: jsrkiwi, Plaintiff Questions re logs, sales, and travel Questions 1-18 relate to the...
  3. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112 OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, and may it please the court. This case is deeply about fairness, market integrity, and equal enforcement. The evidence will show that DCT...
  4. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    The Plaintiff apologises to Your Honour and this Honourable Court for the delay in filing this opening statement. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93 OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, and may it please the court. This...
  5. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S RULE 5.5 MOTION Your Honour, The Defence incorrectly reframes the third claim for relief as a simple evidentiary dispute about when a book was updated. That is not what the claim is about. The claim is part of a broader allegation that the Department of...
  6. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION (#42) Your Honour, Exhibit P-201 is directly tied to the Plaintiff’s planned questioning of Vernicia. It includes her sworn testimony regarding the context of Exhibit P-111. It is required to prevent Vernicia from giving misleading context...
  7. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    RULE 4.6 EVIDENCE SUBMISSION This might be improper, since these documents are already preserved on the forum. However, to ensure that the record is complete, the Plaintiff enters the following into evidence under Rule 4.6: P-201: Testimony by Vernicia in the case jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar...
  8. J

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR NOLLE PROSEQUI The Plaintiff, in light of Your Honour’s ruling on the Defendant’s Rule 5.5 motion, and recognising that the matter cannot be successfully pursued further, respectfully moves that the Court discontinue the...
  9. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENCE’S INTERROGATORIES 1. Have you ever entered the property C995 other than by warping to a /home? Yes. 2. Have you ever entered the property c108 other than by warping to a /home? Yes. 3. What does the Plaintiff understand “read before entry” to mean, as shown in...
  10. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    RULE 4.6 EVIDENCE SUBMISSION Persuant to rule 4.6, the Plaintiff enters the following into evidence: P-111: The entirety of all Discord direct messages between Vernicia and jsrkiwi as of 21st November 2025.
  11. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS LIST The Plaintiff will not be adding any additional witnesses at this time. The witness list, therefore, remains as originally filed: jsrkiwi Vernicia Goldendude15 Roryyy_
  12. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honour, the Plaintiff seeks to compel the following from the Defendant: Production of all records and evidence held by the DHS in respect of the five charges against jsrkiwi of Trespass, except for those already...
  13. J

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honour, I respectfully submit that the defence’s objection mischaracterises the nature of the question. The form of the question (‘To the best of your recollection, recount the events of 9th November 2025’) is a proper, permissible open-ended question and not a breach...
  14. J

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    CONSOLIDATED LIST OF WITNESS QUESTIONS In accordance with the Trial Protocol and Rules filed as #43 on 16th November 2025 by His Honour Judge Mug, the Plaintiff’s questions for witnesses are listed below. There are follow-up questions included. Please note, as Trentrick_Lamar is the Defendant...
  15. J

    Lawsuit: In Session jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    I apologise Your Honour, I am unaware of the methods that staff use to search logs, and was not aware that such a search would be time-consuming for staff to carry out. Would Your Honour consider including a significantly more limited version of the request: 3. Any logs or other records...
Back
Top