Recent content by jsrkiwi

Please note that the foundation papers for the Foundation were filed originally on 19 October 2026. No reply was received by 2 November 2026. Therefore, the Foundation was deemed to be incorporated on 2 November 2026 as per §20.3 of the Redmont Corporate Entities Act.

Please note that the foundation papers for the Foundation were filed originally on 19 October 2026. No reply was received by 2 November 2026. Therefore, the Foundation was deemed to be incorporated on 2 November 2026 as per §20.3 of the Redmont Corporate Entities Act.

Please note that the Corporation filed for incorporation on 19 October 2026. No reply was received by 2 November 2026. Therefore, the Corporation was deemed to be incorporated on 2 November 2026 as per §20.3 of the Redmont Corporate Entities Act.

Entity Name The Woolmart Corporation In-game Firm Walmart Economy Explorer Link DemocracyCraft Economy Explorer Purpose The Corporation is established to conduct retail and wholesale trade, including operating shops and buying and selling goods, and to engage in any other lawful...

Entity Name KIWI GALLERY FOUNDATION In-game Firm KiwiGal Economy Explorer Link DemocracyCraft Economy Explorer Purpose The Foundation exists to promote the appreciation and preservation of art in Redmont through collecting, conserving and exhibiting artworks for public viewing, and...

Entity Name KIWI PUBLIC SPACES FOUNDATION In-game Firm KiwiPSF Economy Explorer Link Firms · DemocracyCraft Economy Explorer Purpose The Foundation exists to improve the built environment and community life in Redmont through creating, maintaining and improving public spaces and venues for...

Entity Name KIWI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION In-game Firm KiwiCharity Economy Explorer Link DemocracyCraft Economy Explorer Purpose The Foundation exists to benefit the community of Redmont by advancing education and skills; relieving financial hardship; helping new and established players...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT FOR THE DEFENCE Your Honour, and may it please the Court. The statements made by roy405 were opinion based upon a test performed on the armour by roy405. Even if they were statements of fact, they were factually correct...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, Question 6 asks, “If yes to Q5, what did he tell you?”. The witness answered that question in the first two sentences of his response. The Defence objects to the following additional passage: The...

Response to cross-examination objections by the Plaintiff I have used a similar style of question numbering/referencing that Your Honour used previously in this case. To save Your Honour having to scroll back and forth, I’ve included the relevant question and objection in quote boxes throughout...

Cross-examination questions for frodo1005 Please note, Q2 is a followup to Q1; Q4 and Q5 are followups to Q3; Q6 is a followup to Q5; Q8 is a followup to Q7; and Q9 is a followup to Q8. 1. During the crossbow test you described under direct examination, did any of roy405's shots cause you to...

To make it easier to follow the objections against the refiled questions, I have numbered them according to Your Honour’s numbering methodology, with an additional master objection at the top. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION – BREACH OF PROCEDURE RE TIMELINESS...

Your Honour, since I filed this application for appeal, it has come to my attention that the Plaintiff perjured herself in her case filing. I therefore request your permission to append this additional ground for appeal to the original application, with it’s accompanying evidence: 5. Perjury by...

- Client & counsel name: @roy405, represented by @jsrkiwi - Appealed case name & style: emmythegremlin v. roy405 [2026] DCR 24 - Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Defendant - Reason for appeal: Summary of the case Roy405 attacked and killed emmythegremlin while she was...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION – LEADING QUESTIONS The question embeds the proposition that statements regarding the Plaintiff’s products were made by roy405, and merely asks the witness to confirm his presence. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF...