Recent content by J_The_Fae

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honor,The Defense humbly requests that the Plantiff’s complaint be dismissed in its entirety under Rule 5.5 (Lack of Claim) due to a lack of evidence, and in support thereof alleges: Due to the court ruling to strike...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE The Defendant moves that the document P-001 be struck from the court record on the basis that editable text logs on their own, lacking a secondary source of verification, are insufficient evidence - as established in...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE Under Rule 4.6 of the deprecated Court Rules and Procedures, the document presented in this case filing is not labeled using the correct P-### formatting. As permissible under this rule, the Defendant requests...

Your Honor, respectfully, the objection additionally refers to the "Google Doc Evidence" in the Plaintiff's original case filing, which is similarly unlabeled. The Defendant wished to request that this also be struck for improper formatting. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE The document and screenshots presented by the Plaintiff are not adequately labeled as required by Rule 4.6 under the deprecated version of the Court Rules and Procedures, which pertain to this case. The Defendant...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, The Defendant entered into a verbal contract in global chat with the Plaintiff that included simple terms: a $1,000 loan would be met with a $1,050 repayment; following this, the Plaintiff sent $1,000 to the...

The Plaintiff has no further questions, Your Honor.

The Plaintiff reserves the right to ask follow-up questions.

The Plaintiff asks the following of @julimonki: What is it that the Defendant seems to do in P-001? 2. What did you do after the Defendant's actions in P-001?

Notice to the Court Your Honour, On behalf of the Plaintiff, Noadenmark, Talion & Partners INC. respectfully welcomes Your Honour to this matter following the voluntary recusal of the prior judicial officer. For the Court's convenience, the following items are presently open: 1. Motion for...

Yes, the Plaintiff observed the Defendant’s statement.

In order to have submitted the evidence, the CDefendant had to have observed the CPlaintiff's statement. My answer to the interrogatory was explaining why the CDefendant filed this suit despite the CPLaintiff's statement; said statement cannot dispute the CDefendant's claim to repayment because...

The CDefendant submits these answers to the CPlaintiff's interrogatories: 1. What specific communication from the CPlaintiff established an agreed repayment of $2,100 rather than $1,050? When the CPlaintiff requested the second loan of $1,000, he followed this request with the statement “so...

I'd also like to ask for an extension of 24 hours to answer the interrogatories separately.

I request leave to file the answer to counterclaim now.