IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your Honor, the matter before this court rests on one primary question. Did the sudden and unexpected camping trip that the Defendant was taken on nullify the contract between the Defendant and the Plaintiff? The Plaintiff...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
It has now been 72 hours since the Defense was instructed to post questions for their second witness and 24 hours since Your Honor pinged the Defense. The Defense has posted neither questions nor a request for...
RESPONSE
No such motion type exists nor does the Court Rules & Procedures establish re-examination as existing. To the best of the Plaintiff's knowledge, there is also no precedent establishing such a thing.
Defense claims that the current witness is an adverse witness despite the Defense...
RESPONSE
Perjury: This represents a misreading of the evidence. The plaintiff's and coshljose's messages clearly indicates that a mortgage had already been agreed to, and that the pending matter for the mortgage is just the production and signing of formal paperwork. The statement "morgage [sic]...
6. Describe how the defendant's failure to purchase and transfer C117 has or has not impacted your ability to pay back your mortgage.
The plaintiff reserves the right to ask follow-up questions.
Clerk note: Question struck by Court.
3. P-004 shows you sending $28,000 to the Defendant. It also shows you discussing a mortgage that you took out. How much of the $28,000 that you sent, if any, is from this mortgage?
4. What did you intend to do with plot C117 when you signed the contract with the Defendant?
5. Why do you no...
Response
Re: Non-Responsive - "I was forced to sell" clearly answers the question. If the witness has sold the plot, then they do not still own it.
Re: Narrative - Nothing about the question asked indicates that the response was only to be a yes or no. Furthermore, the witness's answer is not...
@fickogames
1. In P-007, you mention that the money you sent to the Defendant came from a loan. Has the Defendant's failure to fulfill their contractual obligations impacted your ability to pay back this loan?
2. D-004 shows you purchasing the plot sometime after the Defendant failed to purchase...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your Honor, the Plaintiff once again requests clarification. Is the plaintiff permitted to begin cross-examining the witness in question now, or should that wait until the Defense has questioned the other witness? In either scenario, the...
Your Honor, Plaintiff respectfully requests clarification. What is the deadline for any follow-up questions the Defense has for the party-witness? Is the deadline similarly tolled until 10:15 AM EDT on the 16th of April or was it your Honor's intention that the Defense was to post their...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE
Questions 6 and 7 are not relevant to the matter at hand. The status of any council that has or has not been retained by the Plaintiff is fully unrelated to the matter in dispute, which is the breach of the contract...
RESPONSE
Section 5 of the Contracts Act defines two types of terms: express terms and implied terms. Section 12 defines the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealings. Consider the line "fickogames lends R$28,000 to Ollie_Minecraft to buy property C117 from the DCT eviction auction". The express...
RESPONSE
The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defense's Motion to Dismiss. Precedent shows that the dismissal of Claim for Relief 2, 3, and 4 would be improper.
I. On The Second Claim for Relief
As explained by the Defense, the Redmont Civil Code Act preserves common law torts. Breach of...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.