Recent content by drew_hall

  1. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 5

    The Supreme Court would like to express our apologies for the delay in our response in this case, due to vacations and sicknesses we have been unable to adequately tend to it until recently. We assure this will not happen again, and again apologize for the inconvenience. The Plaintiff may offer...
  2. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth v. Bardiya_King [2023] SCR 23

    Motion is denied. The Supreme Court will begin deliberations on this matter at this time. The court is in recess pending the verdict.
  3. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth v. Bardiya_King [2023] SCR 23

    I have no questions at this time
  4. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Snowy_Heart v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 10

    The Supreme Court has unanimously decided to deny this motion. As a reminder, the Commonwealth has approximately 25 hours left to respond with their answer to the complaint filed.
  5. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 5

    The allotted 72 hours has now passed, and frankly the Supreme Court is disappointed. Why has the Attorney General responded to a non-witness summons with a simple "I'm present, your honor"? Why was no answer to the complaint filed? The commonwealth has forfeited its right to file an answer to...
  6. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Snowy_Heart v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 10

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the court in the case of the Snowy_Heart v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 10. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour...
  7. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Snowy_Heart v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 10

    The Supreme Court has denied this injunction at this time. It is imperative that when an individual asserts a legal position within a case that the opinion presented is ultimately backed by existing law. In the injunction presented before the Supreme Court there was a major lacking in terms of a...
  8. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Krix v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 8

    I will offer these questions to the Plaintiff in this matter 1. How do the claims filed arise to the level of governmental changes of a system of governance? In your initial filing you mention the reasoning that there is a requirement, or at least allude to one which may be present, that upon...
  9. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Krix v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 8

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the court in the case of the Krix v. Commonwealth of Redmont. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff...
  10. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 5

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of the MilkCrack v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 5. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in...
  11. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Milkcrack v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 5

    Both requests to file an amicus brief are accepted and will be heard before a ruling on the emergency injunction. Please file them within 72 hours from now.
  12. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Dismissed CorruptedtheWolf v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 6

    This is not an issue for the Supreme Court to hear. While the Supreme Court will ensure that the case filed in the Federal Court is moved along, this simply should have been addressed in the original case. Allowing the opportunity for damages to occur does not grant those damages valid, rather...
  13. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Bezzergeezer [2024] SCR 3

    Based upon the Attorney General's filing, and the subsequent response after that filing, this case will be dismissed at this time. This case has been dismissed without prejudice.
  14. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Dismissed zLost v. The Commonwealth [2023] SCR 21

    Since all of these issues seem to have been resolved, we will instead be moving forward to opening statements. The plaintiff may present their opening statement to the court within 72 hours
  15. drew_hall

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Bezzergeezer [2024] SCR 3

    As the authority granted was given under the previous Attorney General, and that authority was not noticeably extended beyond that particular announcement, the court will be requesting a statement of approval from the current Attorney General to continue moving this prosecution forward. At this...
Back
Top