Recent content by Dr_Eksplosive

  1. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    The Defence has failed to comply with a court directive within an extended amount of time. They are hereby held in contempt of court. For every 24 hours further they fail to submit the documents will result in another contempt of court charge.
  2. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39

    As both sides have agreed, Defendant is hereby ordered to follow the terms listed. The plaintiff is advised to refile should the Commonwealth break faith. Dismissed, good day to all.
  3. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    Granted. You have 48 hours extension from your initial deadline.
  4. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    In Regards to the Objection on the grounds of Non-Responsive; The Court has decided to Overrule this objection. The Defendant has clarified to the court they have no other documents to provide. Should they be concealing these documents, or the ramifications of the non-existence of these...
  5. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39

    All witnesses have appeared before the court within the allotted timeframe. Thank you. The Defense shall be allotted 48 hours to post any questions for these 3 witnesses. Witnesses shall be afforded 24 hours to respond following these questions. Any follow ups may be asked within 24 hours of...
  6. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Granted. You have an additional 12 hours to the original deadline.
  7. Dr_Eksplosive

    China

    China.
  8. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Accepted. Given that the wording can be a bit finnicky, I prefer to err on the side of caution. The witnesses' response will be struck from record and be discounted.
  9. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Rejected. The court finds that the witnesses' response was concise and within the scope of the question. Rejected. The court finds that the witness was testifying to their own beliefs. As the Plaintiff's examination of the witnesses has elapsed, the Defense shall be afforded 72 hours to pose...
  10. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39

    @Vroomba, @GoldBlooded @End are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of FCR 39 End vs. The Commonwealth of Redmont
  11. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39

    Rejected. How many times must I warn you that this line of argument will bear no fruit? From this point forward, should you attempt to make similar wasteful objections, you will be sanctioned accordingly. This is your final warning.
  12. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session Vanguard & Co v Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32

    Denied. Court is in recess. Motions will no longer be entertained. Sustained. Request for Amicus Brief denied.
  13. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39

    Plura72 is hereby sentenced to death by public execution. charged with contempt of court for disrupting lawful court procedures. The Department of Justice is recommended to investigate potential obstruction of justice. Additionally, the Defense is afforded 48 hours to submit their Opening...
  14. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy v. lukeyyyMC_ [2025] FCR 30

    Case is hereby in recess pending verdict. Please bear with me as this may take a while.
  15. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: In Session End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    Case is hereby in recess pending verdict. Please bear with me as this may take a while.
Back
Top