Recent content by dodrio3

Permissions to respond.

Integritory: In your answer to the complaint, you agree with the statement that a goal does not count if it is caught by the leash before entering the goal, yet in P-004 it is clearly shown that this happens in all the penalties that the Reville Legion goal keeper faced. What was your reason...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE The Defence’s first point claims that the Reville Legion is not a legal entity; they provide no proof of the accusation, and further, P-005 shows the Reville Legion are in fact, a legal entity...

The Plaintiff enters the following evidence P-005

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE The Defence’s second point draws an analogy to Department of Homeland Security cases involving incorrect prison sentences. This comparison is not relevant to the matter at hand, which concerns the alleged mismanagement of...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE The Defence point 3 is not relevant as it refers to policy that happens "IRL" and not within the world or laws/policies that are active within the commonwealth.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION Your Honour, The defence submits that they are not liable for their actions on the basis that they were working on behalf of the Commonwealth. However, the only evidence provided to support this claim is [2025] DCR 49, in...

Permissions to respond your honour.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Reveille Legion (Lex Titanum Representing) Plaintiff v. BabySoga Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. Reveille Legion - Plaintiff...

We would use around $24,000 for the employment of new staff, which would help facilitate our free legal services that we offer and also increase employment of individuals in the legal sector: $8000 1x Associate ($2000 a week) $18000 3x Paralegals ($1500 a week) The additional $6,000 can be...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION Your Honour, the defence submits that Lex Titanum has not suffered any injury as it is not a named party in [2024] DCR 43 - Appeal. However, the ruling of the appeal is limited to only legal fees. Since the awarded damages...

Permissions to respond your honour.

Firm Name Lex Titanum Which grant pool are you applying for? Law Firms How do you plan on using your grant funding? We plan to use the funding to support our free legal defence and prosecution services. We also offer free legal advice to all clients. The funding will help us expand our...

Here is the proof of qualification as required by the dismissal without prejudice