Recent content by dodrio3

  1. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending Dodrio3 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 65

    The plaitiff did request to call a witness
  2. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    Out of interest your honour can you please state what court procedure requires permissions to respond to a motion.
  3. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: In Session Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION – BREACH OF PROCEDURE As per court Rule 6.6 (Response Times). Any objection must be responded to within 24 hours of the defence having taken over 50 hours, more than 2x what is allowed under the court rules. The Plaintiff request...
  4. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    Your Honour, Throughout this case, the evidence has shown that CatBoi27’s actions were not merely incidental but egregiously wrong. On July 22, 2025, the Plaintiff was the victim of an unsolicited attack, resulting in both the destruction of his enchanted netherite leggings and emotional as...
  5. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    This is just an extremely pathetic attempt by the defence. There is no official court rule or procedure that forces us to require permission to respond to a motion.
  6. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    What is presented here is not a motion to reconsider, but instead a personal attack on me because I was not able to respond
  7. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    It has been amended.
  8. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    All numbers are from the August CPI which the defence had no problem using in this answer to Complaint.
  9. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    This is an error in typing in which an extra 2 was added by mistake. I will amend this with permission your honour.
  10. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending FireMatt_N v. CatBoi27 [2025] DCR 66

    Your Honour, though the facts and evidence presented in this case it is clear that the plaintiff was repeatedly harassed by the defendant. It can be seen in P-001 that defendant attacked the plaintiff twice and killed him once, these actions would cause any reasonable person to have some for of...
  11. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending Dearev v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61

    The Plaintiff request that we instead extend Discovery to 7 days.
  12. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: In Session Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION – CALLS FOR CONCLUSION Question One: The question asks the witness to provide an opinion on whether BabySoga acted “on purpose.” This calls for a conclusion as it seeks inference of intent rather than a factual testimony...
  13. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: In Session Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - AMBIGUOUS It is hard to know what the Defence is asking the witness for in the questions. Even the witnesses do not know what they are asking. Additionally, I ask that if this motion is granted, a timeframe be put in place to...
  14. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: Pending Dearev v. YeetGlazer [2025] DCR 61

    Are we able to contiue.
  15. dodrio3

    Lawsuit: In Session Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    May we get a response to this request?
Back
Top