Recent content by DETECTIVHOLMES

Defence requests an extension to discovery of at least 24 hours to have a chance to respond to the newly submitted evidence so the court can proceed and host a fair trial.

The defendant believes they were clear enough, but will confirm again. The same people who filed the record took the images.

Yes Your Honour, the Counter-Plaintiff would like to proceed into inquest, the DOJ sees that valuable information may be obtained through this.

In answer to the above. The P-002 was attached to the first record, filed by current Homeland Secretary GreyMC. The records to which P-003 and P-004 were attached were filed by Lieutenant Sonofalancer.

Defence modifies their Interrogatory to: "Would the plaintiff please point out any position under the bank, that a person could be physically manifested in, that is not within the bank's vault?" The defence isn't asking the plaintiff for their location or any other privileged information, but...

The filing has been amended accordingly, Your Honour. The counter-plaintiff thanks the court for its time, appreciates the ongoing situation, and is patiently prepared.

Hiii Miss Watson, I'd like to rescind the pharmacy registration. Thank you for your help.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT - BREACH OF PROCEDURE A "Response to reponse to objection" or a "response to counter to objections", are neither recognised filings under the Court Rules and Procedures, you cannot respond to a response to objection, and the plaintiff is further refusing to...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT The plaintiff refused to answer the interrogatories pleading his 5th amendment right under the Redmont constitution. Which is the right to not produce self incriminating evidence. The plaintiff cannot invoke that right in this specific...

Apologies I've filed this way too early, please do ignore me. (I inform the courts that I have removed some questions I had ready for the defendant) I would also like it to be made clear, that the plaintiff intends to call the defendant to the stand as a hostile witness.

OF INTERROGATORY SUBMISSION 1) Where was the plaintiff during the incident when P-002 was taken, if not in the bank's vault? 2) The plaintiff, being present in both screenshots, must state where exactly they were when a. P-003 was taken b. P-004 was taken 3) State whether you have any...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT RELEVANCE? The identity of the photographer is also irrelevant and does not change the fact that it exists. Nothing the defence can reveal can change the outcome, and this only serves to waste the court's time, as photographic images and screenshots are not the...

In response to the interrogatories, 2) Nothing was added to the record after it was first submitted. 3) It should be known that acquiring such data fairly is impossible, the DHS could not have been able to find a nearby player's exact coordinates without the use of disallowed tools. 4) The...

Right, Interrogatories, The defence submits the following in answer to interregratory 1. The evidence used was the articles submitted by the plaintiff, The 1st charge was attached to P-002, the 2nd charge, to P-003, and the 3rd to P-004. These were the pieces of evidence the DHS had relied on...

For the sake of readability, Your Honour, I will group my objections into one. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES I. No. 2 RELEVANCE - COMPOUND QUESTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Interrogatory No. 2 combines four distinct sub-questions under subparts (a) through (d)...