Every single Public Defender has declined this case or had a pre-existing LOA, or resigned upon being assigned.
I'm personally already handling multiple cases, could we perhaps toll this case for 1 week to ensure the Defendant receives adequate counsel?
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS
I. On Procedure
There is no "Motion for Terminating Sanctions" in the Motions Guide, so this Motion could be denied on this alone. Alas, if your honor is inclined to treat this as a Motion for...
The Defendant has not been online in Minecraft for over a month.
They have not posted in the DC Discord for over a month.
They have not logged into the Forums in a week
And have not posted since March 20 (see 1 Message, only in this case).
I have been unable to contact the Defendant. I...
Response to objection
It was viewed by the Plaintiff, as shown with an extraordinary high degree of certainty in the Plaintiff's Case Filing. Notably, the law states "Plaintiff, Defendant, or Counsel" rather than only "Counsel"
The National Exchange of Redmont (NER) is where RDS is/was publicly listed, and in the channel #rds is where the Prosecution obtained Exhibits P-001 and P-002.
Notably, the Ownership Structure was sent on September 21, 2025, and the "Statement for Nov" was sent on November 7, 2025...
OBJECTION
PERJURY
The burden belongs to the Plaintiff as the Criminal Code Act requires Plaintiffs and Prosecutions to provide exculpatory evidence, under penalty of Criminal Charges if they do not, see "Duty to Disclose".
Your honor,
I have assigned @ToadKing to this case, however, I am struggling to reach him.
If he does not respond with 48 hours I will assign a new Public Defender.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE
1. Screenshots showing the full message chronology between Plaintiff and Defendant
- The Defense is satisfied with the Plaintiff's submissions in this regard.
2. Proof that the documents were sent before...
Your honor, I apologize, but I ask for a few extra hours and the answer to a question:
Are you seeking a submission of the evidence required by the Motion to Compel?
If no, what should be submitted?
OBJECTION
HEARSAY / RELEVANCE
Exhibit P-007 is simply a third party claiming to have seen/spoken with the Defendant. This is neither proof the Defendant was around, nor is it even valid witness testimony under oath.
Precisely zero Public Defenders responded to my requests, your honor.
If you would allow it, I can personally represent the Defendant. I can have a filing ready 24 hours after your let me know.
Thank you.
Alas, we will enter our Opening Statements.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
I. ON THE FACTS OF THIS CASE
First, I want to address the facts set forth by the Prosecution. The Plea format given by the courts does not include affirming/denying facts like the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.