Good evening, your honor.
Please forgive my informal message, but I'm not sure what it would qualify as.
I don't believe Pepeccu or their counsel has made a brief?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
BRIEF
WHY 12700K SHOULD RECEIVE BOTH PLOTS IN QUESTION
1. The initial legal action was taken by 12700k on August 24, 2025 (see Lawsuit: Adjourned - 12700k v. MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 89).
WHY PEPECUU SHOULD RECEIVE NEITHER PLOT AND NO...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
INTRODUCTION
Your honor, this case is a simple one.
The following facts are undisputed:
1. On October 26, 2022, the Former Honorable Judge dygyee ordered "the DOJ to fine the NotGamerrr $5,500 and unfine Crxka the same...
Your honor, may I have an extension until Monday evening (Central Time) due to IRL circumstances?
(I'm not sure how many hours that is due to timezones - it might not even be an extension at all)
2. When this happened in the past, did this prohibit the DHS from processing unfines?
3. Has the DHS processed any unfines for the verdict of [2025] FCR 32?
4. If #3 is yes, which unfines have been processed?
5. If #3 is yes, to what extent have all unfines been processed?
Questions for @Rory
1. In the past, has the DHS (or formerly, the DoJ) processed fines for individuals who did not have sufficient balance to pay them by having a record of how much these individuals owed and fining them whenever their balance was sufficient?
There are follow-up questions.
Your honor,
I apologize for the delay as I found myself out of town this weekend. I have questions written on my computer at home, but won't be back until Monday.
Could I have an extension until then?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Your honor,
We have not failed to include a party. We are suing the Commonwealth for their actions, not Pepecuu.
Furthermore, "Violation of Due Process" is not a valid reason to dismiss, however, I'll go ahead...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your honor, there isn't much to say. The Defense affirmed every single fact except for Fact 6, which stated that the Defense did not intend to comply with the court's order.
This is either an immense oversight by the Defense...
Your honor, I ask you reconsider:
I couldn't actually care less whether 12700k receives the plots, as I'm being awarded $75,000 in legal fees either way.
My analysis would be, as my Amicus Curiae Briefs always are, strictly factual.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.