Recent content by Dartanboy

Your honor, I believe discovery has ended.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, there is no alternative explanation. Clearly, the Commonwealth is able to read and write as they found the case and have written posts in this one. They are clearly aware of the case previously mentioned, as they linked to it. They're even aware of the...

PERJURY I represented the Plaintiff in the mentioned case, however, I was not the Plaintiff.

I, Dartanboy, hope we can get a good, economically conservative President to save us from our failed economy.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Dartanboy Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Dartanboy (Plaintiff) 2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant) II. FACTS 1. On...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The Plaintiff moves to make the following amendment to the complaint: IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 1. The plot S104 2. The plot C745 3. $250,000 in Compensatory Damages for the money not paid back from the contract. 4. $75,000 (30% of...

The Plaintiff submits the following evidence:

Your honor, the Plaintiff agrees with the extension for different reasons.

Your honor, it appears Exhibit P-002 did not enter into the spoiler correctly, however, it is still attached to the post as an attachment. May I fix the error?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Justice Compass, Ltd. (CEO Dartanboy representing) Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Justice Compass, Ltd. (Plaintiff). 2...

The Plaintiff is willing to participate in an in-game trial.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, part of this lawsuit is claiming that there is an extensive right to due process that covers Summary Proceedings (see Opening Statement, Part IV). There is absolutely a cognizable argument that would extend due process rights to summary proceedings. We ask...

PERJURY Superwoops claims they are unable to view the contract, yet also (falsely) asserts the terms of the contract. Both of these cannot be true, and therefore he has perjured in this court.

Your honor, The Defendant's counsel appeared 4 days ago. We believe it would be prudent to continue the case.

PERJURY The Defense is making up statements and claiming the Plaintiff made them. While at first I had believed this to be an honest mistake, they have continued to say this lie even after being corrected. See: