Recent content by Dartanboy

Nay - BM plots are already scarce. Allowing people to have 3 would be ridiculous.

Nay - Not focusing on the real problem. We should scrap the nomination idea and automatically trigger a special election. Let the people choose their Congress - that's literally the whole point.

I don't believe anyone can force the Commonwealth to prosecute. So no objections?

I don't believe anyone can force the Commonwealth to prosecute. So no objections?

I don't believe anyone can force the Commonwealth to prosecute. So no objections?

Question for the Defendant: I'm not claiming it was an Act of Congress, but it is a law. Department policy is law, right? If not, please explain.

Exhibit A: https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/iiNuZR_--qsJk90rX9n8x4wHfeIBK1JV3xQQOdKZedjpXP6WB1W9puutze0v7W_I2EQfjSq49tbwiDSEZtrBLauHr2JN06NnrECCcEE3sbhr-881GG1JR9nW_72jKvwrCNCw-E9gW1A55j39lqjr2-c Exhibit B...

Exhibit A: https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/iiNuZR_--qsJk90rX9n8x4wHfeIBK1JV3xQQOdKZedjpXP6WB1W9puutze0v7W_I2EQfjSq49tbwiDSEZtrBLauHr2JN06NnrECCcEE3sbhr-881GG1JR9nW_72jKvwrCNCw-E9gW1A55j39lqjr2-c Exhibit B...

Consent to Represent:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. xinexyax(Dartanboy representing) Defendant I. PLEA The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY. II. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. DISPUTE that on the 16th of April 2024, President GoldBlooded...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. crytiee (Dartanboy representing) Defendant I. PLEA The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY. II. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. DISPUTE that on the 16th of April 2024, President GoldBlooded...

Due to not receiving a response, I will be posting my Answer to Complaint now. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Dartanboy Defendant I. PLEA The Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY. II. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. DISPUTE that...

I will be representing the Defendant in this case:

(If the motion is somehow denied, I'd like the opportunity to present an Answer)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The Defendant requests dismissal under Rule 5.4 - Original Jurisdiction. This case seeks only a $20,000 fine and no other sentencing. The Federal Court holds original jurisdiction.