Introduction
Good Morning, Hon. Ameslap.
This brief seeks to provide only facts and legal analysis, without bias for either party.
On Dearev's Political Affiliations and its Implications
Dearev is a member of the Workers' Party of Redmont (WPR)
This isn't inherently an issue, however it...
Good evening, Honorable and Learned Judge Ameslap.
As a political independent, longstanding lawyer, and former Chief Justice, I seek the opportunity to provide an Amicus Curiae Brief going over the following facts:
Dearev's political affiliations
xEndeavour's history with the Defendant...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECUSE
We have awaited a verdict for nearly two months now. We request either:
Commitment to a verdict within 7 days' time, or;
Recusal for another Judicial Officer to take over.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
The Contracts Act clearly states that "An offer is a clear and unequivocal communication expressing a party's willingness to enter into a contract"
"Okay 10k?" fails to meet that definition, especially noting the...
MOTION TO DISMISS
Your honor,
Long-standing precedent in all three courts dictates that when a Plaintiff fails to pursue the case, it is dismissed.
See
[2021] DCR 69 - Lawsuit: Dismissed - lawanoesepr v. Admin23 [2021] DCR 69
[2022] FCR 89 - Lawsuit: Dismissed - Matthew100x & xLayzur v. The...
(I was able to finish over lunch - sorry for asking for the unneeded extension)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your honor,
This case is nothing but a cash-grab... an attempt to take money from my client for using his constitutional right to political...
MOTION TO DISMISS
"NotADoctor9218" is not the Plaintiff. "Doc" is.
As the person in this screenshot does not have the same name as the Plaintiff, this case should be dismissed without prejudice until such time as it is filed on behalf of the actual Plaintiff, or the actual Plaintiff appears.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Doc
Plaintiff
v.
qsdt
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. AFFIRM The plaintiff, Doc, was offered 5k Redmont Dollars in order to kill the defendant, qsdt.
2. AFFIRM the Plaintiff rejected the offer.
3. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS
TheGreat_Boi has not provided proof of representation, making the initial case filing invalid. This case should be dismissed without prejudice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.