Recent content by DaanBanaan5673

  1. D

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd et al. [2026] FCR 55

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honour, The repeal of the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act does not warrant dismissal of this case. The repeal of a statute does not automatically extinguish liability for conduct that occurred while...
  2. D

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd et al. [2026] FCR 55

    Your Honour, My clients are still willing to pursue the matter. Furthermore, the Closed Court will no longer be necessary since I have apparently already submitted the evidence in my Case Filing, apologies. We are ready to continue the case. DaanBanaan5763, Counsel for Plaintiffs...
  3. D

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd et al. [2026] FCR 55

    Your Honour, I was unable to contact my clients yesterday and I am doing my best to re-establish communication. Today however, I haven't been home all day and just got home. I am tired and it is almost 11 PM. As such, the Plaintiff respectfully requests a 24-hour extension to re-establish...
  4. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DEFENDANT’S QUESTIONS FOR CROSS-EXAMINATION Questions for Witness SplashyAlpaca77 Did Poy Bank explicitly approve your loan, or did they only indicate that the bank might be able to provide it? Was $45,000 the actual final specific amount of...
  5. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    Your honour, I apologise for the delay, but I unexpectedly had a private matter to attend to. I respectfully request the Court give me a three hour extension as to not have to rush this matter. The Defence thanks the Court for its consideration.
  6. D

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd et al. [2026] FCR 55

    Your Honour, I apologise but I have been very busy and have been unable to consult with my clients. As such, I am respectfully requesting a 24-hour extension. The Plaintiff thanks the Court for its consideration.
  7. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    Your Honour, Complex interest is not a thing. It is either compound interest or simple interest.
  8. D

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd et al. [2026] FCR 55

    *Plaintiff, not Prosecution, apologies, seems like my poor sleep schedule is starting to take a toll on me.
  9. D

    Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd et al. [2026] FCR 55

    Your Honor, The Prosecution was still in the process of submitting evidence in closed court since no party was never given any invite link to the Judiciary Discord server. However, since it has been almost two months now I will have to confer with my clients regarding their wishes to keep...
  10. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    We do wish to do so, however, witness SplashyAlpaca77 is yet to answer our follow-up questions, as well as the question we objected to as Non-Responsive.
  11. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    The Defence would also like to add that as a result of the Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's deadline the Defence lost its opportunity to conduct its cross-examination after the Plaintiff's examination, which is how it would otherwise occur under the order of examination. The...
  12. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honour, By allowing the Plaintiff to examine the witnesses after the Defence had already conducted its cross-examination, the Court has effectively granted the Plaintiff the ability to formulate examination questions based on the...
  13. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS FOR THE WITNESSES Follow-up questions for SplashyAlpaca77: 7. You stated that you had received verbal confirmation that you would likely obtain the loan. Who provided this confirmation to you and what specifically were you...
  14. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - NON-RESPONSIVE Your honour, Witness SplashyAlpaca77 failed to properly answer question 5. The question expressly requires the witness to specify whether the loan would have used simple or compound interest, yet the witness failed...
  15. D

    Lawsuit: In Session PlayerData vs NorthernCrypiot [2026] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, The Plaintiff failed to comply with the deadline set by the Court for submitting its questions to the witness, and we have since proceeded to cross-examination. Allowing the Plaintiff to submit and...
Back
Top