Recent content by CreeperTD

  1. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending Workers' Party of Redmont v. Town of Oakridge and Smami [2026] FCR 107

    I recuse due to my bias towards this absolutely horrible evil human being who wants me to recuse.
  2. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Budgieboy [2026] FCR 111

    The Court notes that Prosecution edited their initial complaint without notice to the Court. This was done to fulfill a Court order, but parties are still obligated to inform the Court of any such edits. The Prosecutor can consider this to be their only warning about this. Summons shall now be...
  3. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. RobotLeonMC [2026] FCR 106

    The Court has thusfar noted 9 counts of Contempt of Court, and shall formally register that now before continuing further. Defendant RobotLeonMC is charged with 9 counts of Contempt of Court, each carrying a penalty of 10 Penalty Units and 10 minutes jail, for a total of 90 Penalty Units and 90...
  4. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed CreeperTD v. zPokebr_ [2026] DCR 193

    Your Honor, I am happy to inform the Court that a settlement has been reached between the Plaintiff and the Defendant at this time. The Plaintiff requests the recognition of this settlement by the Court and this action’s subsequent dismissal. Edited to correct an error
  5. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Budgieboy [2026] FCR 111

    … where is the evidence?
  6. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed VoidChampion v. bernard_matoff, Atrile and Norpie

    I will treat this as a motion to Nolle Prosequi, and I grant this motion. I suggest not appearing before the Courts without legal representation again.
  7. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed VoidChampion v. bernard_matoff, Atrile and Norpie

    You may not edit your messages substantially without approval from the court. This message is struck for being out of turn as well. This is your only warning before you are held in Contempt.
  8. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed VoidChampion v. bernard_matoff, Atrile and Norpie

    I have changed my mind, I will preside over this case. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER The Court has seen multiple issues with this petition. For one, the Plaintiff is not legally qualified. This does not have to be an issue, but the Complaint appears to have been...
  9. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Dismissed VoidChampion v. bernard_matoff, Atrile and Norpie

    This is remanded to the District Court, I will not preside over this case.
  10. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    The Court notes that the time for any questions to the first two witnesses (OwnedBlock and IgnitedTNT) has elapsed; as such both witnesses are dismissed from the Court. Thank you for your punctuality and cooperation.
  11. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    In the meantime, the Court orders witness zPokebr_ to answer the below questions. You have 24 hours. Whenever a Prosecutor is assigned, they will have their allotted time to submit cross examination questions, to file objections, etc.
  12. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending Workers' Party of Redmont v. Town of Oakridge and Smami [2026] FCR 107

    The Town of Oakridge and @Smami are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Workers' Party of Redmont v. Town of Oakridge and Smami [2026] FCR 107.
  13. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. .SteelBirch6844 [2026] FCR 94

    @Superwoops in the interest of fairness and the judicial economy, I give the Commonwealth 48 hours to assign a new prosecutor to this case before it continues further. I believe this best for the proper administration of justice.
  14. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. RobotLeonMC [2026] FCR 106

    You are your own lawyer, as such you are not entitled to a Public Defender.
  15. CreeperTD

    Lawsuit: Pending Workers' Party of Redmont v. Town of Oakridge and Smami [2026] FCR 107

    This motion is granted, I will inform the DOC.
Back
Top