IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Answer to Complaint
Maks3kk0x
Plaintiff
v.
Alexotto09
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Defendant does not dispture the timeline and plaintiff's presence
2. Defendant admits sending plaintiff an offer for $999.
3. Defendant does not...
Expression of Interest – Public Defender
What is your username?
budgetmich1
What is your total playtime?
1d 4h 58m
In your own words, please explain the role of a Public Defender.
A Public Defender fills in important legal gaps, offering services to the indigent and representing the...
Plaintiff submits our witness list:
Monzter9697
Defendant will be able to ask plaintiff the questions in their interrogatories at trial, even if this Court does not extend discovery.
Your Honor, plaintiff’s video evidence is not improper and was presented during discovery. Defendants have presented evidence that but for our video would be inadmissible but continue to suggest it is somehow our burden to produce evidence that does not exist (or is worse than the evidence...
Your honor, the video includes all of the chats and all of the time at issue in the complaint. We suggest that is, in fact, better than the bare chat logs (which, in the event of a conflict with defendant’s, would be at least partially inadmissible). Any additional footage would be irrelevant.
Plaintiff submits exhibit P-003, a video depicting the events of 27 May, including the chat log. This should satisfy defendant's request for plaintiff's chat log.
The recording can be found here: Proton Drive
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Strike
Monzter9697
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
v.
misterY3597
Defendant/Counterplaintiff
Plaintiff moves to strike the exhibit labeled D-001. R.C.R.P. 4.6 provides that "[e]ditable text-logs are INADMISSABLE without corroboration...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Answer to Countercomplaint
Monzter9697
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
v.
misterY3597
Defendant/Counterplaintiff
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff admits the allegation.
2. Plaintiff denies the allegation.
3. Plaintiff denies that the...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion for Leave to File an Answer to Defendant's Counterclaim
Your honor, plaintiff requests leave to file the below answer to defendant's counterclaim. As the counterclaim hinges at least in part on the veracity of the allegations in the...
In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont
Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Strike Exhibits P-001 and P-002
Your Honor, defendants are abusing the motion to strike at this stage. Defendant admitted to standing across from my client. P-001 shows the person standing across from my...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE BUDGETMICH1 IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
The Commonwealth asks this Court to excuse the government from liability where it violates Constitutional rights in good faith. This Court, in the interest of...
Your honor, I request leave to file a brief _amicus curiae_ regarding the assessment of RCCA liability in constitutional cases.
My interest is as an Attorney who has litigated constitutional cases before and as a citizen of Redmont whose constitutional rights are necessarily intertwined with...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.