Recent content by AmityBlamity

Your Honour, It's clear that the only reason the Plaintiff wishes to dismiss this case is so he can participate in a bit of "judge shopping". He literally admits he does not wish to continue these proceedings "before the current presiding officer". While I am fine with this case being...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure Judge ko531 is NOT the presiding officer. Your Honour, Magistrate Superwoops is. Judge ko531 evaluated the Motion to Recuse and denied it. The Plaintiff's motion isn't even a Motion to Reconsider the Motion to Recuse. It's a...

Requesting permission to respond to the Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss and the Motion to Reconsider, Your Honour. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure The Honourable Judge ko531 already replied to the Plaintiff's motion for recusal. Not sure what else he's hoping...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure Your Honour, responses to motions require permission from the presiding officer. Something the Plaintiff has already been warned about, yet he continues to act like he is above our rules and regulations. I request this response be...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Your Honour, I believe this case has gone on long enough. If Your Honour will not allow for a Motion to Dismiss due to it being "untimely", then per the Court Rules and Procedures, I motion for judgement under Rule 9.2...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure Your Honour, Defendant's counsel respectfully draws the Court's attention to the out of turn statement made by the plaintiff. This is neither a filing, a statement, an objection, or a question of the court. It isn't permitted...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT Motion to Dismiss Per Redmontian Court Rules and Procedures, the plaintiff respectively moves to dismiss this case under Rule 2.1. I put forth Sockful v. unalign [2026] DCR 100 as relevant precedent. Per Justice Matthew: Thus, I move for Sua Sponte Dismissal.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT Objections Your Honour, for the sake of readability, I am grouping all objections into one post: Q1. Relevance: This question is irrelevant to the case at hand. My client is free to make himself invisible if he so chooses. Plaintiff is fishing. Q2. Speculation...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT Objection - Breach of Procedure Plaintiff's post is neither a motion, an objection, or any kind of proper court filing. I hereby request it be struck entirely.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT Objection - Breach of Procedure Your Honour, Typical court procedure allows for one party to ask questions of a witness, followed by the opportunity for opposing counsel to object to any questions they deem inappropriate. Here, however, the plaintiff has seen...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, The Plaintiff admits their civil claim rests on "Battery", supposedly existing under common law. I offer the following cases: [July 2026] Baeser v. GeneralBuggy & Nufuli, where Justice Matthew demanded: As well as Le9endz_ v...

Present. Asking for 48 hours to make myself familiar with the case.

Your Honour, I don't see the DOJ retrying this case, so happy to dismiss with prejudice.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOELLE PROSEQUI Your Honour, the Department of Justice no longer wishes to pursue this case due to unfortunate public interference in what otherwise should have been a non-partisan and fair process. We request the dismissal be made with prejudice.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT Motion to Nolle Prosequi Your Honour, whilst I understand the case is coming to a close, the DOJ no longer feels the need to pursue this action any further, and moves to dismiss the case.