Appeal: Denied FCR 37 - Appeal request.

[Bibsfi4a]

- Client Name: CrackedAmobea1
- Counsel Name: Lovely Law firm
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff
- Reason for the Appeal:
Your honor, there had been a technical issue by one of the companies client, in the case, we had all the proof required. But in the case, we could not receive the righteous money, due to lack of evidence. The real reason we could not provide proof was, due to a technical issue in the previous lawyers side, which made the imgurs link unable to work / broken (the link contained the required proof.) Hence this resulted in the court not giving us any money. Hence, we request to re-file the case, with a working link, and all the proof provided, so that we can actually fight a fair case, and win the righteous money so that my client can be compensated fairly.

- Additional Information: Your honor, we are sorry for the mistake. The previous lawyer were not so experienced, hence the mistake occurred. We will make sure to not repeat this mistake, and hope you will give a fair chance at compensation, at further of all, justice!
Thanks, thats all, thanks for reading through, and I wish everyone a great day.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Given Chief Justice Nacholebraa's resignation last night, this appeal is on hold until another Justice is appointed.

 

[RelaxedGV]

View attachment 43374
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
The Supreme Court in a 2-0 decision has decided to reject the appeal of FCR 37.

The Supreme Court has decided to do this for the following reasons:

The following opinion is written by Acting Chief Justice RelaxedGV and agreed upon by Justice SumoMC:
The reasoning for this is a lack of showing the proof within the appeal. The point of Discovery is to discover or get new evidence from the Defense, testimony, etc. Not for providing your evidence. The Presiding Officer saw the case and gave a ruling based off the evidence at hand which that being a lack thereof, it is not a fault of the Presiding Officer for failure to rule regarding evidence that was non existent, while this is an appeal to refile the case with new evidence, the fact that the evidence is not provided in the appeal is concerning.

The Appeal is the way to get a new case, given that we have to rule on the appeals on whether there is a warrant for a new case and given the entire appeal is based off of evidence that was not provided and that said evidence was not provided in the appeal, we have elected to reject this appeal.

The Supreme Court thanks you for the Appeal.​