Lawsuit: Adjourned Yeet_Boy v. NotGamerrr [2022] FCR 73

[LieutenantDerp99]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION


Yeet_Boy (LieutenantDerp99 representing)

Plaintiff


v.


NotGamerrr

Defendant


COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:


The Defendant came to the Plaintiff seeking a loan of approximately 15K. The Plaintiff agreed to this so long as the Defendant paid the loan back by the end of two weeks. Once the contract was written, the Defendant signed it and agreed. Despite this, the Defendant missed the set due date to pay the loan back.


WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I. PARTIES

1. Yeet_Boy

2. NotGamerrr


II. FACTS

1. NotGamerrr came to Yeet_Boy in Minecraft, requesting a loan of exactly $15,000 for his brewing company. (Exhibit-A)

2. Yeet_Boy agreed and wrote a contract for both parties to commit to. The details enclosed in said contract were that NotGamerrr had the right to receive the 15K loan, as long as he paid back with 10% interest by two weeks, resulting in $16,500 back to Yeet_Boy. (Exhibit-B and Exhibit-C)

3. When the two weeks were up, NotGamerrr had still failed to pay back his loan that he promised. Yeet_Boy repeatedly contacted NotGamerrr about this, but the Defendant never responded.


III. CLAIM FOR RELIEF

1. Breach of Contract

2. Fraud


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $16,500 for the loan back, plus interest
2. $100,000 in damages as outlined by the contract


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 27th day of September 2022

Attachments​

Exhibit A - Proof the Defendant requested $15,000

Exhibit B - Proof of payment by the Plaintiff

Exhibit C - Proof of contract through in-game book

 

[JoeGamer]

This case will be moved to the Federal Court docket as the Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction over this case.​

 

[Banana]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@NotGamerrr is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Yeet_Boy v. NotGamerrr [2022] FCR 73.

Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Banana]

Given that more than 48 hours has passed, a default judgment will be made.

 

[Bibsfi4a]

Your honour before you make a default judgement , I request a extension of 24 hours because NotGamer was in unplayable conditions and a lot of irl issues , so I hope you can understand and give us 24 hours to present our point so justice can be given.


Proof of representation-

 

[Banana]

The extension will not be granted, as absolutely no communication was made before the time limit expired. A default judgment will be made.

 

[Banana]

Given that an in-game document was submitted to the court as evidence, I would like to review said document in-game as part of the verdict consideration. I request that the Plaintiff either send the original or a copy of the original document if the original is not available through the post within 48 hours.

 

[LieutenantDerp99]

Your Honor, I present to you a written copy of the Plaintiff's contract in the document below.

 

[Banana]

Do you have any version of the in-game book signed by the Defendant? I would like to make sure there is a signature on it, and the terms are the same as in the photos, because of the limitations of the forums style of presenting evidence.

 

[LieutenantDerp99]

Affirmative, Your Honor. I request that an in-game meeting be scheduled between the Plaintiff, you, and me, in order present the book to you.

 

[Banana]

The Plaintiff has described the location of their book, and that they are unable to access it due to being deported.

 

[Banana]

I have reviewed the book in-game and will post a verdict shortly.

 

[Banana]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Yeet_Boy v. NotGamerrr [2022] FCR 73

I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff provided a loan with an attached agreement. This agreement had specific terms and conditions that both parties agreed to, shown by the Defendant signing the book
2. The Plaintiff upheld their end of the agreement and the Defendant failed to do so

II. DEFENSE’S POSITION
1. The Defendant did not appear in court

III. COURT’S OPINION
1. The contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was clearly articulated
2. Both parties clearly agreed to it
3. All parts of the requirements for a legally enforceable contract were met in this case

IV. VERDICT
I hereby find in favor of the Plaintiff. I order that the Defendant be fined $116,500 and the Plaintiff be unfined the same amount by the DOJ.

The Court thanks both parties for their time. This case is now adjourned.