- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
kisskissy
Plaintiff
v.
stellar_night
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
At approximately 17:30 on the 9th of June, the Defendant, stellar_night, intentionally murderd and commited theft on the Plaintiff, kisskissy, without any consent, the incident took place in Aventura, after the Plaintiff respawned and went back to Aventura, he saw the stolen fish being sold to 'Larry The Fisher'.
I. PARTIES
1. kisskissy, Plaintiff
2. stellar_night, Defendant
3. MaxvEtten, legal representative for Plaintiff (Proof below)
II. FACTS
1. At 17:30 on June 9th, the Plaintiff was fishing in Aventura.
2. The Plaintiff was only wearing iron boots.
3. Immediately prior to the murder, the Plaintiff was placing fish into a bundle. Upon death, the Plaintiff dropped the bundle containing the fish.
4. The Defendant intentionally atackted the Plaintiff once with a combat knife, resulting in the Plaintiff being murderd.
5. There was no consent, provocation or legal self defense whatsoever, allowing the Defendant to atack the Plaintiff.
6. The Plaintiff died, and dropped a bundle worth about $350.
7. After respawning, the Plaintiff travelled back to Aventura, and saw the Defendant selling the bundle containing the fish to 'Larry The Fisher'
8. The Plaintiff told the Defendant to return bundle, which was completly ignored.
9. By refusing to return the bundle after being informed that it belonged to the Plaintiff, the Defendant demonstrated an intent to permanently deprive the Plaintiff of their property.
10. The Defendant's actions caused harm to the Plaintiff, and created a valid case for civil damages arising from criminal conduct.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
Claim I: Theft
1. According to the Criminal Code Act, when a player takes property belonging to another without consent and intends to permanently deprive the owner of it, it falls under Theft.
2. The Defendant's conduct satisfies this definition because the Defendant took possession of the Plaintiff's bundle after the Plaintiff's death, retained it despite the Plaintiff's request for its return, and subsequently sold its contents for personal gain.
3. Since the incident happend in Aventura, the wilderness exception does NOT apply.
4. Under Redmont law, crimes may be used to seek civil damages, and civil proceedings may proceed independently of any criminal prosecution.
Claim II: Murder
1. According to the Criminal Code Act, when a player unlawfully kills another player, it falls under Murder.
2. The Defendant’s conduct satisfies this definition because the Defendant deliberately murderd the Plaintiff with a Combat knife without legal justification
3. Since the murder happend in Aventura, the wilderness exception does NOT apply.
4. Under Redmont law, crimes may be used to seek civil damages, and civil proceedings may proceed independently of any criminal prosecution.
Claim III: Compensatory Damages
1. The Plaintiff seeks Compensatory Damages, in the amount of $350 for the value of the stolen property.
Claim IV: Nominal Damages arising from Theft
1. The Plaintiff seeks nominal damages because the Defendant's theft violated the Plaintiff's property rights beyond the direct financial loss suffered.
2. The Plaintiff seeks $2,500 in nominal damages. This amount is based on the severity of the Defendant's conduct. The Defendant intentionally and unlawfully stole property belonging to the Plaintiff without consent or legal justification. The Defendant's actions deprived the Plaintiff of their lawful property and violated the Plaintiff's property rights. The requested sum is intended to compensate the Plaintiff for the loss suffered and to deter similar conduct in the future.
Claim V: Nominal Damages arising from Murder
1. The Plaintiff seeks nominal damages because the Defendant’s unlawful conduct violated the Plaintiff’s rights, even if the Plaintiff does not claim a larger proven financial loss.
2. The Plaintiff seeks $2,500 in nominal damages. This amount is based on the severity of the Defendant's conduct. The Defendant murderd the Plaintiff without provocation or consent using an combat knife, while the Plaintiff was only wearing Iron Boots. The attack was deliberate and unprovoked. The requested sum is intended to compensate for the seriousness of the murder and to deter similar conduct in the future.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $5,350, consisting of:
a. $350 in Compensatory Damages
b. $2,500 in Nominal Damages arising from Theft
c. $2,500 in Nominal Damages arising from Murder
2. Any applicable legal fees awarded to the prevailing party.
3. Any other relief the Court finds just and proper.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 9th day of June 2026