Appeal: Accepted FCR 55 - Appeal Request

[Dartanboy]

Client Name: Yeet_Boy

Counsel Name: Solid Law Firm

Were you originally the plaintiff or defendant: Plaintiff

Reason for appeal: The lawsuit was dismissed on the grounds that the Plaintiff was attempting to hold the Commonwealth accountable for a private transaction between the Plaintiff and OverlordofPeonys. While this private transaction was mentioned in order to provide a value for the disputed property, it was abundantly clear throughout the Case Filing and the Plaintiff’s response to the Motion to Dismiss that the Plaintiff did not expect a refund from the Commonwealth. Additionally, the DCT is not allowed to evict those who do not meet the qualifications outlined in the Jurisdiction Act (which are not met by my client), so allowing this to happen without hearing this case would be allowing the DCT to blatantly violate the law.

Additional Information: Link to the case: Lawsuit: Dismissed - Yeet_Boy v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 55

 

[drew_hall]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

The court has decided to grant this appeal. We have chosen to do so on the basis of renter's rights.

Please refile your appealed case in the Supreme Court sub-forum at your earliest convenience.​