Lawsuit: Adjourned Cofys v. daddy_borsato [2022] FCR 75

Dartanman

Citizen
President of the Senate
Senator
Justice Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Aventura Resident
Dartanman
Dartanman
presidentofthesenate
Joined
May 10, 2022
Messages
1,049
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Cofys (Solid Law Firm representing)
Plaintiff

v.

daddy_borsato
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Defendant entered a contract with the Plaintiff, in which the Defendant agreed to pay back $10,450 for a $9,500 loan, in six payments of $1,742. The first due date was September 4, 2022. The Defendant has not made any payments nor had any communication with the Plaintiff in nearly a month.

I. PARTIES
1. Cofys
2. daddy_borsato

II. FACTS
1. The Defendant entered a contract with the Plaintiff, in which the Defendant agreed to pay back $10,450 for a $9,500 loan, in six payments of $1,742.
2. The first due date was September 4, 2022, and then every week after that until paid off.
3. The Defendant still has not paid any of the money back.
4. The Defendant has not communicated with the Plaintiff since August 28.
5. The Defendant broke the terms of the contract.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant entered a legally binding contract, including a clause stating the Defendant was to pay back $10,450 in payments over a specific time period.
2. The Defendant has failed to make those payments, and has refused to communicate with the Plaintiff.
3. The Defendant broke the terms of the contract.
4. The contract also accrues an additional 10% fee per day a payment is late. The date is now 9/26/22.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. $10,450 to pay back the loan.
2. $3,832 (10% of one payment, 22 times [$174.20 * 22]) due to it being 22 days late at this point.
3. $500 in legal fees.
(Total of $14,782)

Evidence:
Exhibit A: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1023618597546905713/1023620441006407750/borsato1.png
Exhibit B: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1023618597546905713/1023620441388105769/borsato2.png

Proof of Consent to Represent:
Gtc4EEqbS2QY9GPB6MKyER6yXIuohnbSBz7L25eZpKuKcWd0HgdxcfdnxLWS10ea0eGllfkf4NbHe3Nl0E46yzVjPiQLUbjk0orZXG35gnk5DH9lpDSGg1SHIxEEbjK12572N8oMtJHihhuz8QP7ZHpPYRO-uHO4lkgoC9I2Yoa2H7lP71aR0-Q53w


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26 day of September 2022.
 
federal-court-png.12082


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The Defendant is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Cofys v. daddy_borsato [2022] FCR 75.

Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 
Given that more than 48 hours has passed, a default judgment will be made.
 

Verdict


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Cofys v. daddy_borsato [2022] FCR 75

I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff provided a loan with an attached agreement. This agreement had specific terms and conditions that both parties agreed to.
2. The Plaintiff upheld their end of the agreement and the Defendant failed to do so.

II. DEFENSE’S POSITION
1. The Defendant did not appear in court.

III. COURT’S OPINION

1. The contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was clearly articulated
2. Both parties clearly agreed to the terms and conditions of the contract
3. All parts of the requirements for a legally enforceable contract were met in this case
4. By this definition, the Defendant broke the contract and the Plaintiff is eligible for remuneration

IV. VERDICT

I hereby find in favor of the Plaintiff. I order that the Defendant be fined $14,782 and the Plaintiff be unfined the same amount by the DOJ.

The Court thanks both parties for their time. This case is now adjourned.

 
Back
Top