Lawsuit: Adjourned cjcroft v. YoungBuck2k [2021] FCR 55

pugbandit

Citizen
Commerce Department
Public Affairs Department
Joined
Sep 3, 2020
Messages
269
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


cjcroft
(pugbandit Representing)
Plaintiff

v.

YoungBuck2k
Defendant

COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:


The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Defendant had agreed to a payment for a service to the Plaintiff which has not been received and this has halted business and multiple attempts to reach out to Defendant were also made before taking this to the court.

I. PARTIES

1. Cjcroft
2. YoungBuck2k

II. FACTS

1. YoungBuck2k placed an order at Design Studio.

2. The price that was agreed to pay was 5000$

3. YoungBuck2k went inactive and did not pay.

4. Materials were already bought for the project YoungBuck2k wanted.

5. Multiple attempts were made to contact YoungBuck2k for payment.

6. After failure to respond the Plaintiff had no chance but to take this to court.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The defendant gave his signature and acknowledged the contract’s existence
2. The defendant has not fulfilled their part of the contract and has breached the contract and agreement that was done with the Plaintiff.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $5000 for payment for resources and the agreed work which was done
2. $2000 for damage caused to the business in the time and legal fees.

1622231181195.png

1622231240441.png

1622231292012.png

1622231486714.png

1622231499257.png
 

Attachments

  • 1622231332297.png
    1622231332297.png
    123.4 KB · Views: 120
  • 1622231340517.png
    1622231340517.png
    69.2 KB · Views: 108
Before proceeding, could the Plaintiff please clarify what date the alleged dispute was? This is to ensure it still stands pursuant of the Statute of Limitations.
 
Before proceeding, could the Plaintiff please clarify what date the alleged dispute was? This is to ensure it still stands pursuant of the Statute of Limitations.

The alleged dispute began in mid April however the Plaintiff believes that as there was an attempt to contact the Defendant in many ways but still there was no response therefore the case is still valid due to all other attempts falling short and this being the final course of action that needed to happen. We believe that the breach of contract is still occurring today as no response has come.
 
PwFVDhr.png

IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of the cjcroft v. Youngbuck2k. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

 
Before we proceed to default judgement, how does section 2 of the prayer for relief add up? How much would be for legal fees and how much for damages?
 
$450 in legal fees, your Honour.
 
Thank you. So could you explain why the company faced an additional $1550 in damages?

I just don't see a need to grant any more than the legal fees and the $5000 for the project, unless the Plaintiff is able to provide an adequate explanation that the Defendant caused damage and or harm directly to the company.
 
Thank you. So could you explain why the company faced an additional $1550 in damages?

I just don't see a need to grant any more than the legal fees and the $5000 for the project, unless the Plaintiff is able to provide an adequate explanation that an additional $1550 in damages was incurred.

The Plaintiff's business has been staggered as without the original payment other orders could not be completed. To recover from this the Plaintiff would like compensation.
 
The Plaintiff's business has been staggered as without the original payment other orders could not be completed. To recover from this the Plaintiff would like compensation.
Thank you. The court will now review the case made and provide a verdict shortly.
 

Verdict

As the defendant has failed to appear in this case within the 48 hours allotted, I will proceed with a default judgement.

For the monetary damages in addition to the $5k for the lost work, I don't find grounds to fully grant such given that (a) there has been no evidence provided to show that other orders were not completed as a result; and (b) the inactivity of the defendant has persisted for a long time, indicating that if the company was truly damaged without the payment, they would have pursued a refund on the $5k in court much earlier.

I hereby order the Department of Justice to:
(a) Fine the Defendant, Youngbuck2k, $5000 for the lost work, and transfer such to the Plaintiff, cjcroft.
(b) Fine the Defendant, Youngbuck2k, $450 in legal fees, and transfer such to the Plaintiff, cjcroft.

This case is hereby adjourned. The court thanks the Plaintiff for their time.

 
Back
Top