Alexander P. Love
Managing Partner, Dragon Law
Construction & Transport Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Supporter
Willow Resident
AlexanderLove
attorney
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2021
- Messages
- 582
- Thread Author
- #1
- Client Name: ChAkslesn
- Counsel Name: The Lovely Law Firm
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff
- Reason for the Appeal: Judge BubbaRC erred in his judgement of the case when he instructed the DOJ to “to fine the defendant for however much of the $505,960 as they can obtain and unfine that amount to the plaintiff” when the wording currently standing as precedent in the Supreme Court is to the effect of “to fine the defendant $505,960 and unfine that amount from the Plaintiff”. In a similar case, where the Defendant was banned, the precedent was still set for the wording to be “I order: The transfer of $14,300 from the defendant to the plaintiff.” (Lawsuit: Adjourned - YoungBuck2k (Prodigium and Partners at Law Representing) vs YTAnarchy | Case 3-2021-21). The precedent should have been followed, since there was no reason to do otherwise. Congress created provisions to handle court debts in the anticipation that they would have to deal with it eventually, and therefore the Court owes Congress no favors as far as saving money. Justice should be above this. In fact, all court cases followed the fine x, unfine x formula, except for in the case, which is a clear violation of the right to equal protection and benefit of the law. This departure from precedent has made it difficult for our client to retrieve the compensation he deserves and must be rectified. The Department of Justice previously fined AcilousS a bunch of money for the murder of Chak's villagers, money Chak never saw. He was left with the remaining $400 of AcilousS' balance, essentially nothing to compensate for what was taken from him. This lapse in justice, equality under the law, and immorality should be rectified by the Supreme Court. Thank you.
- Additional Information: Link to original case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - ChAkselsn (The Lovely Law Firm Representing) v. AcilousS [Case No. 07-2021-22]
- Counsel Name: The Lovely Law Firm
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Plaintiff
- Reason for the Appeal: Judge BubbaRC erred in his judgement of the case when he instructed the DOJ to “to fine the defendant for however much of the $505,960 as they can obtain and unfine that amount to the plaintiff” when the wording currently standing as precedent in the Supreme Court is to the effect of “to fine the defendant $505,960 and unfine that amount from the Plaintiff”. In a similar case, where the Defendant was banned, the precedent was still set for the wording to be “I order: The transfer of $14,300 from the defendant to the plaintiff.” (Lawsuit: Adjourned - YoungBuck2k (Prodigium and Partners at Law Representing) vs YTAnarchy | Case 3-2021-21). The precedent should have been followed, since there was no reason to do otherwise. Congress created provisions to handle court debts in the anticipation that they would have to deal with it eventually, and therefore the Court owes Congress no favors as far as saving money. Justice should be above this. In fact, all court cases followed the fine x, unfine x formula, except for in the case, which is a clear violation of the right to equal protection and benefit of the law. This departure from precedent has made it difficult for our client to retrieve the compensation he deserves and must be rectified. The Department of Justice previously fined AcilousS a bunch of money for the murder of Chak's villagers, money Chak never saw. He was left with the remaining $400 of AcilousS' balance, essentially nothing to compensate for what was taken from him. This lapse in justice, equality under the law, and immorality should be rectified by the Supreme Court. Thank you.
- Additional Information: Link to original case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - ChAkselsn (The Lovely Law Firm Representing) v. AcilousS [Case No. 07-2021-22]