Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    @ToadKing @ElysiaCrynn Discovery is now open, this period shall last 5 days Ending on October 24th, 2025 @ 6:30PM EST. If Parties wish to close Discovery early, please advise the Court. If witnesses are requested, please briefly explain the reason for their inclusion. Furthermore, in...
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Sustained. The Court will not refer Culls to the DoJ for Perjury, it doesn't rise to that level. With that being said, the Court holds Culls in Contempt of Court. In review of the post history for the objection made by Culls, the Court takes note that the original submission by Culls was...
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Denied, insofar only as the Defendant's submission was not untimely. (This Court granted 72 hours) The other arguments raised in this motion are acknowledged and the Court reserves its opinion on them.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Movant prays for dismissal on several grounds and Non-movant responds in opposition on several grounds. The Court performs its analysis relying on both parties' submissions. On Defendant's points, the...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Sustained. 1) Statement is struck, Toad is absolutely not within Government. 2) The statement was not malicious enough to prejudice the Court against Plaintiff, no additional actions will be taken. Defendant's counsel is admonished and advised to be more careful.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    Received, the case is tolled for 7 days. A status report is due on 10/26/2025.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    @ElysiaCrynn You shall have 48 hours to respond.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    On review of the Court Rules, I agree, I've been routinely mis-appropriating the amount of time given for an Answer. Nonetheless, your objection proves a consistency for parties before this Court in front of this Magistrate. In future, I will require 48 hours instead of 72 hours, to be in line...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Denied. If you wished to be heard you should've expressed to the Court the reason for the brief, rather than having the Court need to ask you.
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    I need an Answer to the Complaint. If you object to the Complaint again at this stage, I'll hold you in Contempt.
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Sustained. No part of the brief will be considered by the Court. Furthermore, considering the abuse of an brief and the waste of judicial resources, and the resources of the Plaintiff, the Court finds the following. 1) Anthony_Org is held in Contempt of Court. He shall be fined $5,000.00 and...
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Nah, you're good. I just did sustain a response when ideally I would've overruled the Objection. All good!
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Thank you for appearing! You have 72 hours to reply. The Court will disregard this Objection, this should be in your Answer.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    For what purpose does the Pope want to be heard on this manner?
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Certainly Rep. Anthony, I"ll hear you on your brief within 24 hours. If the Court doesn't receive a brief, the Court will exercise its options.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    @Culls , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed DeltaruneTMRW v. Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 81

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH ORDER - Trentrick_Lamar Motion to Dismiss Movant prays for Dismissal for failure to state a valid claim, excessive pleadings, and impermissible prayers. Non-movant was not heard in opposition. DENIED. The Court will not prejudicate plaintiff’s...
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed DeltaruneTMRW v. Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 81

    Understood, you shall have 72 hours to answer the Complaint. The Court warns your client that that failure to comply with the rules and procedures will result in penalties. Discovery has not opened yet, disregard #8
Back
Top