Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    @Rory (@Kaiserin_ , courtesy ping in case DoJ can answer on behalf of DHS). Interrogatory by the Court: Are DHS tickets inherently classified when initially filed?
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    You shall have 48 Hours to present an Answer.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    Granted. Defendant shall preserve logs as described.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    You will refrain from speaking out of turn. Future outbursts and the Court will use Contempt powers.
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    @Trentrick_Lamar , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48...
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Brustklefurry [2025] DCR 84

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict The Court accepts the plea agreement. Brustklefurry is guilty of Unauthorized Medical Sales and shall be fined $5,000 and spend 3 minutes in jail. DHS shall be empowered to perform all necessary duties, and apply for actions as...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Brustklefurry [2025] DCR 84

    A sidebar has been created, Ticket #68 for reference.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52 I. Summary of Controversy Plaintiff approaches the Court alleging malfeasance on the part of Defendant in the management and completion of a DPA football event. Since Defendant failed...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned 12700k V. Aesyr_ [2025] DCR 87

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - [2025] DCR 87 On review of the contract, it is clear that Defendant owes Plaintiff $100,000. The Court awards as following: 1) In compensatory damages, $100,000 2) In Legal Fees: $10,000 Furthermore, for Plaintiff's...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned 12700k V. Aesyr_ [2025] DCR 87

    The Court takes judicial notice of the following communication by 12700k directed toward Magistrate Dearev.
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order of Dismissal The Constitution of this Commonwealth enshrines the principle that its Courts are actively engaged in the protection and advancement of justice. The Courts serve as the primary forum in which citizens may bring legal...
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    Court is in recess pending a dismissal order.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    The Court strikes its order for the Plaintiff to re-file its Complaint. I got confused with the Sofia order I gave in relation to the Complaint in that case, a ruling on the rest of the motion is coming shortly.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order From Plaintiff's statement in the Sidebar on Forums: On review of zLost v. Aladeen22 [2024] FCR 12, the Defendant, Aladeen22, awaited a ruling on his counter-claim after settling the original Complaint. Given this settlement, its...
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    @ToadKing @Imza @ToadKing You have 72 Hours to re-present your Complaint to the Court. If you wish to lodge an Answer to Imza's Counterclaim, you shall until 11/7/2025 @ 1PM EST.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    Overruled. This case shall now be ToadKing v. Imza [2025] DCR 88.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    Granted. The Court explictly wishes to advise that calling this situation akin to "qualified immunity" is a stretch. Case against @Sofia2750 is dismissed without prejudice, on condition. @ToadKing You have 48 Hours to file a Complaint anew against Sofia2750. If you wish to nolle prosequi...
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    Granted. Complaint against Imza is dismissed without prejudice.
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    @Imza @Franciscus @ToadKing The Court has started a DM with parties on the Forums.
  20. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. RealImza [2025] DCR 88

    Granted, cases against EATB and RaiTheGuy07 are dismissed with prejudice.
Back
Top