@Kaiserin_ @12700k @Dartanboy @Pepecuu , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of in re: S104/C475 [2025] FCR 124
In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Administrative Hearing : In Re: S104/C745 [2025] FCR 124
Initial Cases:
(Pepecuu) Pepe v. Matt [2025] FCR 100
(12700k) 12700k v. Matt [2025] FCR 89
Pending Cases:
(Pepecuu) Pepe v. CW [2025] FCR 116
(12700k) 12700k v. CW [2025] FCR 110...
@Pepecuu @Dartanboy
I'm the PO on this case for the purpose of resolving the intra-FCR conflict in relation to these properties. I will ask questions of counselors as needed.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Reconsider - Commonwealth #168
DENIED, with other special consideration.
So, I’m going to deny reconsideration, but I’ll make a note of this clarification within my notes.
Predetermination: A decision-maker (DCT Sec) expresses a...
Overruled. On substantial review of the docket, the omission is not material. The ticket preceding the case was part of the administrative process Plaintiff attempted prior to litigation.
Overruled. The amount in question is not-germane to the questions raised in the Complaint. Yes, the...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to Dismiss - Commonwealth
DENIED.
On a plain reading of the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges potentially unlawful activity being undertaken by DCT. Notwithstanding the underlying procedures at play in the other cases in this Court, this...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT - lukeyyy v. Culls [2025] FCR 114
Summary of Controversy:
Plaintiff approaches Court allegeding breach of contract on a purchase agreement valued at $200,000, with $125,000 in immediate rebate. As of consummation, $75,000 is...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Verdict - [2025] DCR 91
The Court accepted the plea of GUILTY from Defendant and, on hearing the Public Defender for a sentencing guideline, the Court adjudicates as following:
WWW2020 is GUILTY of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.