Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    @EmmDubz @Babysoga4real Parties have 48 hours to resume questioning of witnesses or the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    The Court is now in recess pending verdict. FYI for all parties, I expect to render a verdict by 11/5/2025, this is a very busy week for the Court.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Sustained, the Court will rely on P-001.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    A status report is due for parties. What are we doing here? @EmmDubz @Babysoga4real
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Brustklefurry [2025] DCR 84

    @Novakerbal @Imza I'm now the Mag on this case. Mug's Court Rules: In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours. Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4...
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT - [2025] DCR 85 Commonwealth v. corstkiller00 I. PROSECUTION VIEW Defendant killed Rookieblue14. In doing so, Defendant interfered with the process of justice by harming a Detective. II. DEFENDANT’S VIEW No defenses...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    @ElysiaCrynn You shall have 72 hours to submit a Closing Statement.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    The Court accepts the Guilty plea, the Court will be in recess pending verdict.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Furthermore, Discovery is Closed.
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    @ToadKing You shall have 72 hours to provide a Closing Statement.
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    @ElysiaCrynn I'm okay with it if yall are.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    Sustained, however I'm not going to strike the comment, the Court already handled it.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    The Court finds you in Contempt, you shall be issued a fine of $100 and be held in jail for 10 minutes. If you wish to represent yourself, you'll follow the rules of the Court.
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    You're being charged with "Obstruction of Justice" an indictable offense as defined under the Criminal Code Act. I've review our Court Docket, you haven't been criminally indicted before the Courts before. I'm working on getting you a Public Defender, so they may advise and guide you.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    The Court is going to assign a Public Defender to @corstkiller00. An experienced counselor should guide or be able to respond in opposition (if appropriate) to the Court's OSC.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Show Cause - Sua Sponte Dismissal The Court, on review of the allegations and facts, is concerned with the Commonwealth's ability to prosecute for this specific allegation. As alleged, the Defendant killed a Detective in the course...
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 85

    @corstkiller00 , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48...
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Overruled. The Court will not consider the referenced website or its contents absent a proper entry through discovery. Notwithstanding this, the Court finds the Plaintiff’s inquiry unclear. The incidents alleged, the controversy in August and the speech in October, are capable of being...
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Culls [2025] DCR 82

    Sustained. Defendant's Answer to Interrogatory Q1 is struck. The Court will draw an adverse inference from the Defendant's contradiction. All other requests declined.
Back
Top