Search results

  1. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR NOLE PROSEQUI Following the aforementioned irl event, I have decided to take a break from the game, for an unknown amount of time. Due to that, I ask that this case be dismissed with prejudice. I hope that both Plaintiff and Defense...
  2. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    Your honor, with all due respect this is setting a dangerous precedent. If it may so please the court a parent of a good friend if plaintiff's councel died, and counsel has been asked to help the grieving friend. If we are to just blindly follow every precedent without seeing the people behind...
  3. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    @Muggy21 (sorry for the @ but I do need to get an answer so that I'll be able to organize around the time constraints of the case and my irl schedule)
  4. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EXTENSION - DISCOVERY DEADLINE Due to irl circumstances, Plaintiff Counsel would like to request an extension of discovery by 30 hours believing that by then he would be able to solve his irl situation. [\motion]
  5. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    Your honor, Plaintiff's Counsel submits the following evidence: P-007 P-008 P-009 P-010 P-011 Also may it please the court that there are other evidence, but Plaintiff counsel requests them to be submitted later (due to him being in an irl vacation with limited connectivity)
  6. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER. The Plaintiff hereby requests of the court to reconsider it's second motion for Emergency Injunction (EI). According to the court's Order (to which this message responds) there are two reasons to which the court denies plaintiffs request...
  7. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION The court cited the wrong case in it's court order. After Plaintiff's counsel clarified that to the court, the court still didn't sent the correct case to plaintiff counsel, though it continued to maintain its...
  8. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    Your honor, to clarify that plaintiff understands, the claim here is that due to the Gazette being represented with a: "third party lawyer", the conversation can be used to impeach the lawyer of the Gazette, as he could be a probable witness?
  9. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    Would the court be able to include the right case so plaintiff would be able to learn from his mistakes?
  10. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISCHARGE The Plaintiff is herbey requesting that the Defense Counsel by dissmised and for the defendant to find a new Lawyer to represent him. The motion is submitted on the following grounds: 1. Looking at evidence P-002, the...
  11. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    Your honor, from what Plaintiff can tell the attached case has nothing to do with Political Communications. Was the case attached by any chance the wrong case?
  12. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION The Plaintiff herbey requests a motion for Emergency Injunction for Plaintiff to stop continued release of defematory statements, untill the trial ends. 1. This motion is requested in order to make sure that...
  13. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION The Plaintiff hereby is requesting Emergency Injunction for the deletion of the defematory content, in order to stop the continuing harm to Plaintiff's reputation 1. Emergency Injunction are supposed to stop...
  14. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Redmondt Gazette v Plura72 [2025] DCR 73

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION The Redmondt Gazette (represented by ThePufferOffical) Plaintiff v. Plura72 Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. The Redmondt...
  15. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Plura72 v. Realimza [2025] SCR 17

    Your Honor, May it please the court, that as an investigate journalist for The Redmondt Gazette, who has been covering the Plura72 hearing, I would wish to submit an amicus brief, regarding the usage of lawsuits such as this, in order to incite fear within defendant, and to hurt our democratic...
  16. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ThePufferOffical v. xEndeavour [2025] DCR 69

    Your honor, may I respond?
  17. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ThePufferOffical v. xEndeavour [2025] DCR 69

    The defendant is correct of the exsistance of such law, however, it should be noted that the definitions between the law and the English language, are almost indistinguishable, but for the sake of the court, the plaintiff would like to rephrase his brief to to include the definition of...
  18. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ThePufferOffical v. xEndeavour [2025] DCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE The issue presented in the following court case is not wether there ever exsisted an entity under the name of the Redmont Reforkm Party, but rather if defendants de-registartion of said party, allows him to keep the...
  19. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ThePufferOffical v. xEndeavour [2025] DCR 69

    Your honor may I rephrase?
  20. ThePuffer

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ThePufferOffical v. xEndeavour [2025] DCR 69

    Your honor, it is important to note that it is not the conditional settlement offer that is the problem here, rather it is the clear abuse of defendants former position as Chief Justice, in order to threaten plaintiff. It is important to note that if the message had been sent in any other...
Back
Top