IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
MysticPhunky
Plaintiff
v.
Culls
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Defendant AFFIRMS paragraph 1 of the Complaint.
2. Defendant DENIES paragraph 2 of the Complaint. The statement was not made by a "server staff member"...
Your Honor, in response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss:
Legal Standing
§6(7)(d) of the Criminal Code Act says:
That is what Plaintiff is doing in this case. We are disputing the Department of Homeland Security's summary conviction of Plaintiff. A civil complaint must be the means by which...
Your Honor,
I understand that the case has not yet been called, but the deportation of the Defendant is a special circumstance. I seek the Court's permission to make an amicus brief on the appropriateness of punitive damages and legal fees in these deportation-default cases.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR LEGAL FEES
Your Honor,
Defendant would ask that the Court awards Defendant $3,000 in legal fees under the Legal Damages Act.
Of course, for Plaintiff's counsel, real life must come first. But that doesn't explain why Plaintiff's...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
lukeyyy_ (represented by MZLD)
Plaintiff
v.
Culls
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
lukeyyy_ (Plaintiff)
Culls (Defendant)
II...
If Plaintiff does continue with this case, then Defendant presents amended interrogatories:
3. Did TBT contact Plura72 to ask whether Plura72's endorsement had changed, before publishing the article?
4. What internal guidelines or rules, if any, does TBT have relating to the use of anonymous...
Your Honor,
Defendant believes that Plaintiff is going to Noelle Prosecui this case. Defendant would like to reserve the right to make submissions to the Court on the appropriate amount of legal fees Defendant should be awarded.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Muggy21
Plaintiff
v.
Department of Homeland Security
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. Muggy21 - Plaintiff
2. Department of...
Defendant's Consolidated Response to Plaintiff's Discovery Objections
Your Honor, Defendant opposes all of Plaintiff's discovery objections.
"Why did Plaintiff believe the source was reliable?"
Plaintiff has not cited legislation or judicial precedent in support. To the best of my knowledge...
Your Honor, permission to respond to both of Plaintiff's objections? I'm happy to wait a bit so you can catch up.
EDIT: Plaintiff filed a third objection while I was writing this: I seek permission to respond to #26 too.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL
Your Honor, under Rule 4.7, Defendant moves to obtain the following information from Plaintiff:
1. The location (e.g., which Discord channel or DM) where the conversation in P-004 took place.
2. Any communications between...
Defendant's interrogatories for Plaintiff
Who was TBT's anonymous source in the Plura72 article?
Why did Plaintiff believe the source was reliable?
What steps did Plaintiff take to verify the tip (for example, by contacting Plura72) before publishing the Plura72 article?
Especially with respect...
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions
Your Honor,—
Let me tell you what is missing from Plaintiff’s motion: they have not discussed whether the name of their source is relevant evidence in this case. Indeed, Plaintiff does not dispute that the evidence is relevant. As I said...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.