Pursuant to Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories), the Plaintiff submits the following interrogatories, which the Defendant must answer truthfully and to the best of their ability:
1. On or around 00:39 UTC+1, on the 9th August 2025, you affirmed that you "caused your player model to physically interact...
Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Facts section of the Complaint as follows:
II. FACTS
1. On or around 00:10 UTC+1, on the 9th August 2025, Plaintiff was lying on the floor at spawn.
2. Defendant deliberately approached the Plaintiff's location.
3. On or...
Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the Defendant to produce the following materials relevant to the case:
1. All DOJ training materials, handbooks, or policy documents provided to you upon your appointment as State Prosecutor in August...
The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and requests that this Court deny the motion in its entirety.
The Defendant's motion fundamentally mischaracterises the law, misstates the procedural posture of this case, and improperly asks this Court to weigh evidence and...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Your Honour,
I raise this objection as I believe you have been incorrectly granting more time than should be permitted under Court Rules and Procedures, in a standard case such as this.
Rule 6.6 (Response...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY
Your Honour,
P-002 pertains to the size of the Plaintiff, as well as his role at the time of the act.
It is directly referenced in Facts 5 & 9:
P-002 clearly shows the Plaintiff (on the right), next to a regular-sized...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
ToadKing
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. ToadKing
2. Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1...
Your Honour,
I have been unable to contact the Defendant due to their prolonged absence.
I believe this settlement to be in the interest of all parties and will swiftly resolve the matter. Therefore, the Defendant will agree to all terms of this settlement agreement, and ask the court to...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE, PERJURY
The Plaintiff respectfully objects to this amicus brief for the following reasons:
1. The amicus brief rests on a fundamentally flawed premise, that the Plaintiff is a grape being transformed into wine. The...
Your Honour, I move to strike this
response because I failed to scroll up.
It's late, I'm tired, and I'm on my phone. Please formally warm me so I remember not to make silly mistakes like this again.
Erm...
Your Honour, I believe the Defendant should make these legal arguments in his answer to complaint, which he has not yet been asked for, because all he was asked to do was appear before the court, and make himself known.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION
President Pepecuu was inaugurated on 15 October 2025, in direct violation of the In Staff We Trust Act and the statutory establishment of the national motto. During the inauguration ceremony, which occurred...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION
Judge AmityBlamity was confirmed by the Senate to the Federal Court on 4 September 2025, in direct violation of the Conflict of Interest Standards Act. The nominee provided zero financial disclosure during their...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
The Defence objects to the Prosecution’s failure to comply with the Court’s clear instruction regarding undue delays. Despite being granted permission to respond over 24 hours ago, the Prosecution has neither...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to strike comments made by Angryhamdog, and to hold him in contempt of court.
Angryhamdog has violated basic court procedure by commenting in a case where he is not...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
ToadKing
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. ToadKing
2. Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.