Search results

  1. Dogeington

    Rescinded Equal Employment Opportunity Act

    A BILL To Amend the Commercial Standards Act The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short...
  2. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 55

    Your honor, Given the changes to the complaint, the defense seeks to extend discovery by 24 hours.
  3. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 55

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The defence moves to amend its Answer to Complaint as follows: I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ... 6. AFFIRMS that the Criminal Code Act (previously linked in Fact 3), Part 3, Sections 6, reads: 7. AFFIRMS that the Legislative...
  4. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, The initial deadline for the Answer to the Complaint was Friday at 10:54 a.m. The Commonwealth then requested a 24 hour extension to this deadline, which was granted, extending the deadline to Saturday at...
  5. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Adjourned DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, As previously established by the arrest record of DocTheory, P-003, the sentence that he received for logging out in handcuffs was 20 minutes. There was not any direct action from a member of the Commonwealth...
  6. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ToadKing Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1.DENY that at all times relevant to this action, Defendant served as Vice President, while AFFIRMING that JuniperFig had assumed that office...
  7. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Inknet [2025] DCR 59

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI The Commonwealth moves to drop legal charges. Due to an error by the filing prosecutor, no evidence associated with the criminal charges was filed with this criminal action. Due to this, and following a reassessment...
  8. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. CraftySciGuy [2025] SCR 13

    IN THE SUPREAM COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI The Commonwealths moves to drop legal charges. Following a reassesment of the severity of the alleged charges and a reconsideration of evidance gathered by the DOJ, the Commonwelath no longer wishes to persue criminal...
  9. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER This case is not ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82 concerning the denied FOI request but rather is ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80 which concerns the damages that Toadking sustained from...
  10. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 82

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS - Lack of Jurisdiction The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The group chat in question is not related to DC and is, in fact, a private chat. The...
  11. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80

    Your Honor, In light of the recently filed Motion to Dismiss, the defense requests a 24 hour extension for filing their answer to complaint.
  12. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS - Original Jurisdiction The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. Plaintiff is asking for $13500 in damages plus legal fees. This is less than $120000...
  13. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 55

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT xEndeavour Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM that on August 5 at 11:04 AM, Speaker Omegabiebel made an announcement that xEndeavour was being held in Contempt of Congress...
  14. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Adjourned lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, On the statement “nobody is above the law,” the defense agrees with the plaintiff. Although that is where our agreement stops. There is no one above the law, not even those attempting to commit crimes on the...
  15. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Adjourned DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Thank you for the clarification your honor
  16. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed bigpappa140 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 81

    Just to clarify, this means that the plantiff will need to re file this case in the Federal Court, and that all action here is concluded?
  17. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Adjourned lawanoesepr v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 68

    Your honor, The defense humbly requests a 24 hour extention to submit our closing statements
  18. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed bigpappa140 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 81

    Your honor, I would respectfully ask for a 24 hour extension to the commonwealths Answer to Complaint.
  19. Dogeington

    Withdrawn

    .
  20. Dogeington

    Lawsuit: Dismissed bigpappa140 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 81

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE Evidence P-001, P-002, P-003, P-004, and P-005 are all classified at the OFFICIAL level, as seen in P-004. These messages being shared publicly in this case is therefore a breach of confidentiality, and...
Back
Top