Search results

After careful consideration, the Supreme Court has upheld the ruling on the original appeal. The court finds no compelling arguments to change the initial judgment, and we maintain the ruling of the Federal Court on this matter.

The Supreme Court has decided to maintain its original decision to decline hearing this case. We believe this can be handled internally by the Department. However, we remove the frivolous charge.

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court grants the motion to dismiss. We find that the Plaintiff's claim lacks the required legal grounds to continue. The commonwealth's claim of a factual error under Rule 5.14 is compelling given that Freeze_Line was not appointed officially as Acting Attorney...

The plaintiff has 24 hours to provide a response to the motion to dismiss.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in Titan Law v. the Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] SCR 36. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment. I'd like to remind both...

In a decision 2-0, the Supreme Court has decided to sua sponte under Rule 2.1 and Rule 2.2 since the issues brought before the court can be handled internally by the Department of Justice. Furthermore, the Department of Justice is charged with one count of frivolous lawsuit.

A BILL To Amend the Constitution The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives and Senators in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short...

Not guilty

we do

The Defense only accepted the out of court settlement if there was a verdict on the counterlawsuit.

Your honor, is there any update who will be the new presiding officer? Every day that passes the reputation of my client gets damaged and we really need a side bar

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Aladeen Counter Plaintiff v. Zlost Counter Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Aladeen (Defendant) 2. Zlost (Plaintiff) II. FACTS 1. August 31st, the Plaintiff...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defense moves that the complaint, in this case, be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. I at no point intended to harm the reputation of the Plaintiff, which is something that according to the...

Before the case is dismissed we request an urgent sidebar.

Your honor, my client has a constitutional right to a speedy trial. The fact that the Plaintiff hired inefficient council should not be a reason to prolong this case. Anytime that this lawsuit continues my client is affected.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION President Bezzergeezer Counter Plaintiff v. Zlost Counter Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Defense is presenting a counterlawsuit for legal fees. My client has been forced to...

MOTION TO RECUSE The defense believes that the Honorable Magistrate Anthony is not an impartial judge, and that they have a personal bias against my client. Earlier this year your honor sent multiple messages regarding my client, stating that he is “corrupt” and that he is a “puppet”.

The defense rejects the ingame trial.

Your honor this is an outrageous attempt from the plaintiff to prolong this case and make my client look bad in the public eye.

MOTION TO DISMISS Your honor, we request this case to be dismissed with prejudice in accordance to Court Rules & Proceedings Rule 5.5 Lack of Claim. The plaintiff has failed to provide any evidence to support their claims.