Search results

  1. Nacho

    Expungement: Granted Aurge - [2023] FCR 49 - Expungement Request

    Given how all charges were committed more than 2 months ago, and given how the state does not dispute any of the petitioner's requests. I hereby order that the criminal record of Aurge be cleared of the following charges: 14 counts of Murder. The Federal Court thanks all involved.
  2. Nacho

    Expungement: Granted Aurge - [2023] FCR 49 - Expungement Request

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the court in the case of Aurge - [2023] FCR 49 - Expungement Request. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the...
  3. Nacho

    Expungement: Granted Reaperay - [2023] FCR 48 - Expungement Request

    Given how all charges were committed more than 2 months ago, and given how the state does not dispute any of the petitioner's requests. I hereby order that the criminal record of Reaperay be cleared of the following charges: 2 count of Murder. 1 count of Silly. The Federal Court thanks all...
  4. Nacho

    Expungement: Granted Reaperay - [2023] FCR 48 - Expungement Request

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the court in the case of Reaperay - [2023] FCR 48 - Expungement Request. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the...
  5. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    Providing an update to the members awaiting a verdict. There will be a slight delay in a verdict due to my transitioning to a new role at work which is taking a lot of my time from the server, as well as other members of the judiciary having finals this week for school. If there is an excessive...
  6. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. KyleTivis [2023] DCR 9

    Due to the absence of the individual not appearing before the court. The court will require a public defender to take this case. However, due to the lack thereof public defenders the court will require to go into recess until one can be appointed.
  7. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. KyleTivis [2023] DCR 9

    The request is granted for submitting the missing evidence. Please be prompt in getting it submitted.
  8. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. KyleTivis [2023] DCR 9

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS KyleTivis is required to appear before the court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. KyleTivis. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment. I'd also like to remind both parties...
  9. Nacho

    Why would I ever sue you!!! Unless 100% suing because you brought it up!

    Why would I ever sue you!!! Unless 100% suing because you brought it up!
  10. Nacho

    Expungement: Denied Aurge - [2023] FCR 47 - Expungement Request

    The recommendation from the state does not support this expungement. With that taken into consideration, the court will be denying the request. The Federal Court thanks all involved.
  11. Nacho

    Expungement: Denied Aurge - [2023] FCR 47 - Expungement Request

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS The Attorney General is required to appear before the court in the case of Aurge - [2023] FCR 45 - Expungement Request. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the...
  12. Nacho

    Absolutely love you to Bruh!!!!

    Absolutely love you to Bruh!!!!
  13. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    Thank you to both parties for being prompt with their responses. The court will now go into recess while we discuss the matter of the case and formulate a verdict.
  14. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Mask3D_WOLF v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] DCR 9

    Since the conflict has reached a resolution outside of the court, the case is dismissed.
  15. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    While I do not appreciate you waiting till the last second to request an extension the court will grant a 12-hour extension (from this post) in light of mothers Day.
  16. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    We will now hear the closing statement of the defendant. You have 48-hours to provide your closing statement.
  17. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    With the conclusion of the questions from justices, we now progress to closing statements from both parties. We will begin with the plaintiff. You have 48 hours to provide the court with your closing statement.
  18. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    The state should respond to all questions directed towards the state from all justices who have submitted questions.
  19. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    As all members of the Supreme Court have notated either on the thread od notified me they have submitted their questions. Both parties have 24 hours to publish their responses to the questions given to them.
  20. Nacho

    Lawsuit: In Session Dartanman v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] SCR 13

    These questions are addressed to the State. 1. Can the state define where "Comprehensive Policies" is a means for denying a political party registration? 1.2 Can the State please show where in the "Requirements" section of the political party registration, it describes where "Comprehensive...
Top