Recent content by Banana

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honor, the Defense has alleged that the claims of the Plaintiff are baseless and are outside of the jurisdiction of the court. In my rebuttal, I hope you will see that this is a mischaracterization. I will answer all of the Defense’s claims in the order that...

Your Honor, may I respond to the motion to dismiss?

May it please the Court, Despite the potential contempt of court I may get for this, I believe that it is crucial that I get a chance to respond to the allegations that this is based on a staff matter. My claim of negligence does not have to do with the staff mistake in this case, and claiming...

May it please the Court, I would like to edit for clarity. In referring to the property av-r016 as the Plaintiff's "only residence", or other similar terms, I am referring to it as the sole personal home of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff is technically in possession of another residential plot...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION BananaNova Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On March 17, 2024, I returned to DemocracyCraft after a long break for personal reasons. I saw that...

I will reject the Motion to Dismiss. I believe that there is still argument to be made to determine the validity of the claims for relief. Furthermore, as has been well established by now, lack of evidence is not a legitimate reason to dismiss a case. I will not bar the Defense from making...

My apologies to both parties, I overlooked that opening statements had been presented. We will move on to witness testimony. Both parties may present a list of witnesses to call, or declare that they have none.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Skywat4 v. Awesomestuff113 [2023] FCR 68 I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. The Plaintiff made a contract with the Defendant for the Plaintiff to loan $5,000 to the Defendant. 2. The contract included provisions for interest, as well as late penalties...

I believe that there is not agreement on the facts sufficient for summary judgment, and we will move on to opening statements. The Plaintiff may present their opening arguments now.

The Defense may cross-examine if they wish.

Yes, you may respond to the motion for summary judgment.

Yes, you may.

You may respond to the Motion to Dismiss. If it is rejected, the case will go into a recess while the Defense is away.

I will grant the extension for the Plaintiff. You have 24 hours from this point to post your opening arguments, after which the Defense may post theirs.

It is my opinion that Justice JoeGamer's opinions were not sufficiently negative towards Chief Justice MilkCrack to cause a biased outcome. I believe that Justice JoeGamer has the ability to make an impartial decision based on the facts and arguments alone. I will reject the request to recuse...